• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Marine Vs. HOA over a flagpole

And please drop the Rosa Parks thing...it's absurd.

Dude, its not absurd. Rules are rules remember? Everyone must obey them. Its probably only absurd to you because you dont like that the analogy is a valid point against yours for why it's okay to break the rules. Perhaps if you'd think outside the box and exert some critical thinking skills you'd actually see that. Either way, I'm done with this thread because we're never gonna agree on whose right and whose wrong. So lets both STFU and forget we both said anything.

Good day to you.
 
Dude, its not absurd. Rules are rules remember? Everyone must obey them. Its probably only absurd to you because you dont like that the analogy is a valid point against yours for why it's okay to break the rules. Perhaps if you'd think outside the box and exert some critical thinking skills you'd actually see that. Either way, I'm done with this thread because we're never gonna agree on whose right and whose wrong. So lets both STFU and forget we both said anything.

Good day to you.

There's a very distinct difference between disobeying a rule that discriminates people based on your skin color, something that you do not choose (Beyond tans, etc) and a rule that prevents some one from having a 20 foot flag pole in their front yard.

You're out of your mind if you think they're analogous.
 
For all we know they have an 18' limit on flag poles and the HOA is the party being petty. I understand that he agreed to follow certain rules, but it seems as though the HOA is unwilling to consider rewriting the rules.

Oh, I'm sure they'll consider re-writing the rules... in the same way they always do.

Show up at the HOA meeting with enough association members that agree with you, and you'll have no problem voting to change the rules.

Can't get enough neighbors to agree? That's how HOA's work.
 
The way i see it he tried to work with them.When they were unwilling to give good reasoning as to why they didnt want it other than the bs they gave him he asked again they said no.So he put it up in protest what is the problem with that he is taking action on somthing he belives in!He will have to pay the price for the actions not me or you but he may make it to where we all have a choice how high we hang are flags.People who dont take a stance for there views are slaves of the system!


It's HIS system.

He CHOSE to sign the contract. He CHOSE to be a member of an HOA. He CHOSE to be bound by their rules. He CHOOSES to fund the HOA through dues.

He (and his neighbors) control those rules through a vote.

He's got no one to blame but himself.
 
Nice use of critical thinking skills. Just because "rules are rules" doesn't make them right. This guy is doing the right thing by not taking the flag down.

Would you say the same thing if it was a rule against basketball hoops? Painting your house pink with polka dots?

They're all aesthetic restrictions. Why should the flag be treated differently?

This is how changes in the rules come about, by people like this Marine fighting them. No rules/laws ever get changed without people being noncompliant to them.

No, in an HOA there is only one way to get the rules changed. Play nice with a bunch of your neighbors and get to them to vote with you to change the rules. Being non-compliant won't get you anywhere.
 
Well, seeing as the article said the neighbors don't seem to mind and he gets compliments on it, that also tells me that the HOA needs to STFU and revamp their rules.

No - HE needs to show up at the HOA meeting ALONG with all those neighbors who don't mind. Then those neighbors who say they don't mind all need to VOTE showing they don't mind.

At that point, the rules will change.

This guy (and all his neighbors) ARE the HOA.





But hey, rules are rules and should be obeyed by all. My point behind the example is quite valid because it was said "rules are rules and everyone needs to obey them."

Remember - these rules were not imposed on this guy.

HE CHOSE TO LIVE UNDER THESE RULES.

He knew these rules existed, knew the HOA existed, had to sign a contract to be a member of the HOA... all choice.

A big difference between being held to rules of ones own choosing and those imposed by the government.
 
It's HIS system.

He CHOSE to sign the contract. He CHOSE to be a member of an HOA. He CHOSE to be bound by their rules. He CHOOSES to fund the HOA through dues.

He (and his neighbors) control those rules through a vote.

He's got no one to blame but himself.

This is the most logical and appropriate post in the thread - other than the ones I've contributed saying similar things. :D

Semper Fi and all similar sentiments are irrelevant.
 
wasn't this same story a big deal about a year ago? anyway, i don't like how either party has behaved. as for the Marine, he put up the pole after asking them to and being denied.
"i'm not allowed to do it, but i'm going to do it anyway"

i also don't like the reasons (or lack thereof) that the HOA is saying that they won't allow the pole or even consider changing the rules slightly (like say a 10ft pole) considering the pole doesn't bother any neighbors.
"i want everyone to do what i say and i won't change my views for anyone"

it feels like watching 2 children argue about who is right.
on a side note, i hate HOAs. i believe that if i'm making the payments (or have already paid in full) on my property, i'll do whatever i d@$% well please as long as it doesn't break the law.
 
Dude, its not absurd. Rules are rules remember? Everyone must obey them. Its probably only absurd to you because you dont like that the analogy is a valid point against yours for why it's okay to break the rules. Perhaps if you'd think outside the box and exert some critical thinking skills you'd actually see that. Either way, I'm done with this thread because we're never gonna agree on whose right and whose wrong. So lets both STFU and forget we both said anything.

Good day to you.


Sorry, but the Rosa Parks analogy is, most definitely, absurd.