Obviously I was humble, because I kept getting my ass handed to me. I'm sure you can relate.
LOL. yes poop, it's obvious that your extensive MA training has made you the paragon of humility we see here today.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Obviously I was humble, because I kept getting my ass handed to me. I'm sure you can relate.
That was me. I've trained in ROKUSHAKU BO (6 foot staff), TONFA (nightsticks basically) and NUNCHAKU. I've hit myself plenty, but not as much and for not as long as people learning around me with foam weapons first. Oh and pssst.Oh, and whoever said that you shouldn't use foam weapons when training is a ****ing dumbass because everyone hits themselves in the head or nuts at least once and it sucks.
It's me called up to demonstrate live weapon forms We don't have gun toting cowboys down here mate. Not yet, anyways!
And I don't get into fights. I avoid situations where fights often occur, walk confidently take care and not appear target-like, I conflict resolve my way out of situations before they escalate to a fight, and I recognise when it's time to stop a fight starting
All these traits, combined = SELF DEFENSE! So yeah, blind side or gang attack me me if need be. Or shoot me. Those tactics WILL work a lot of the time.
That was me. I've trained in ROKUSHAKU BO (6 foot staff), TONFA (nightsticks basically) and NUNCHAKU. I've hit myself plenty, but not as much and for not as long as people learning around me with foam weapons first. Oh and pssst.It's me called up to demonstrate live weapon forms
Our brains learn to accept mistakes the more we make them. That was my point. What you think of me for having an opinion is up to you. I would never encourage anyone else to train like that, especially for a sport. I didn't train for sport though.
As for rank I could care less about ranks. That belt only covers 2 inches of your waist, YOU have to cover your ass. And 1st Dan means you know the basics and nothing more. Come chat again at 4th Dan, when you've done something with the knowledge you paid for.
LOL. yes poop, it's obvious that your extensive MA training has made you the paragon of humility we see here today.![]()
Sadly so true, like anything you need to study where you should study. Do feel sorry for those who are not aware until they have already been put off such a great thing.
No need to apologise, I understand why you said it. Teaching is one of the best ways to learn. Pity most people see a black belt as the end of something, not the beginningrock on dude, sorry i called you a dumbass. yea your right though, i knew the basics but thats pretty much it because my sensei was kind of a hacker and just wanted me to keep going to class just to run the lower ranks through drills.
Nothing left to say to me Poops?There's humility, and then there's bending over and taking it. I am not spouting about my "uber skills", I am saying what I know is right. There's a difference.
Nothing left to say to me Poops?
Reading your last couple of posts you have not experienced enough of the arts to know anything about them IMNSHO.
What's left to say? You have this imaginary distinction between martial arts and what fighting is, and there doesn't seem to be a way to change your view.
Capoiera is basically dancing. It was disguised as such so they could practice as slaves and not make a fuss about it. Too bad there really isn't much practical use out of it.

Capoiera is an art, but as far as it being a "martial" art, I'd have to be on poop's side on this... Learning capoiera will surely make you flexible and dexterous, but it won't teach you to kick some ass.
Then again, IMHO, no "martial art" really does. If you want to kick ass, pick up boxing. If you want to learn self control, and keep in shape, pick up a martial art.
Capoeira teaches you to fight the same way training in traditional theatrical wushu teaches you to fight -- "movie star" style.But that's my point, in order for something to be considerd a 'martial art' it needs to teach you a practical way to 'kick some ass'?
Capoiera certainly does teach a way to fight. But just becuase it's not the best one, then it's not a 'martial art'? That seems rediculous to me. By that logic, TONS of styles that almost everyone would agree ARE 'martial arts', in fact aren't, simply becuase they aren't the 'best' fighting styles (by whatever personal definition you use). Think of TKD with all it's fancy flying/spinning kicks. TDK is not a martial art now because it isn't a practical way to fight a real world battle?
Furthermore, since many people agree that the BEST fighting style is Track and Field (for it's superior use of the 'art of running away'), then there really ARE no 'martial arts'. Does this make a vaild argument?
Furthermore, since many people agree that the BEST fighting style is Track and Field (for it's superior use of the 'art of running away'), then there really ARE no 'martial arts'. Does this make a vaild argument?
Capoeira teaches you to fight the same way training in traditional theatrical wushu teaches you to fight -- "movie star" style.
"Martial art" is a very fluid term, and capoeira is very firmly a performance and dance art. Talk to real practitioners of capoeira, they'll be the first to tell you it's very, very "un-martial."
Not to say capoeira isn't amazing, one of the best ways in the world to keep fit (those guys are in scary shape) and requiring the utmost in dedication, focus, and athletic ability -- but it's not going to teach you how to fight. The Protector = not reality.
I dont agree with that personally.