Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Matching headstock poll
- Thread starter DanAdams
- Start date
There's so much "it depends" going on here. Carrots please.
If it's unclear, let me specify a bit.
I'm referring to a headstock that matches the finish of the body rather the natural finish of the neck wood.
(not fretboard)
I'm referring to a headstock that matches the finish of the body rather the natural finish of the neck wood.
(not fretboard)
Did that really need explaining?
I just wanted to clarify. The first response may have had something in mind that I had not considered.
I just added an 'it depends' option with a chance to explain
Last edited:
Right you are. What color is the wood on the fretboard and what color is the bass? None are created equal.
I like them for the most part. It does lend a touch of class. The down side is having to swap a neck. A Blue Bass with a Red headstock might really stress me out.
i'm still confused...
i voted "it depends." explanation: "it depends" is such a great answer when you're not actually sure what the question is.
i like matching headstocks. i also like un-matching headstocks. i even like mismatched headstocks! i like 'em all!
I suppose you're right, as some matching headstocks don't bother me.
However a 'burst' headstock is one that never looks right to me, even though I'm always a fan of a classic burst body.
Last edited:
Matching headstock, even black like Gibson and several other companies do, or I'm not even picking it up and plugging it in.
(Of course, maple fretboards work either way.)
(Of course, maple fretboards work either way.)
doing one in gold, just for something different. Never really preferred it, some colors work better, but since i had the maple neck laying around and extra paint, figured what the heck
I far prefer at least the face of the headstock to be painted / tinted to match.
If it's a natural wood (clear) finish, I'd like a matching veneer on the peghead face to match the top.
I've never warmed up to the standard practice of an often gorgeously finished body, and a plain, clear finished neck sticking out of it. Never have. Never will.
If it's a natural wood (clear) finish, I'd like a matching veneer on the peghead face to match the top.
I've never warmed up to the standard practice of an often gorgeously finished body, and a plain, clear finished neck sticking out of it. Never have. Never will.
On classic Fender-style basses, I suppose I'm gonna go against the grain and say no, I don't like a matching headstock. On these types of basses, I'm a sucker for that aged, honey colored maple... regardless of what the body color is.
Vintage Fender Jazz Basses get a little bit of a break -- I've seen a few of those with a matching headstock and they look sharp... but I'd far prefer to have aged maple up top.
Precisions need maple showing on the headstock face, in my opinion. They don't look right when the headstock matches the body.
But on high-end basses (ex. Pedulla, Tobias, MTD), matching headstocks are okay... but I really like a black-faced headstock (ex. Spector). The black-faced headstock also looks great on Fender- and Gibson-style basses as well -- I've seen a few Sadowsky basses done this way and they look sweet. And Jake Serek's basses look excellent with a black face on the headstock.
Vintage Fender Jazz Basses get a little bit of a break -- I've seen a few of those with a matching headstock and they look sharp... but I'd far prefer to have aged maple up top.
Precisions need maple showing on the headstock face, in my opinion. They don't look right when the headstock matches the body.
But on high-end basses (ex. Pedulla, Tobias, MTD), matching headstocks are okay... but I really like a black-faced headstock (ex. Spector). The black-faced headstock also looks great on Fender- and Gibson-style basses as well -- I've seen a few Sadowsky basses done this way and they look sweet. And Jake Serek's basses look excellent with a black face on the headstock.
I've not been blessed with that distinction.
I'm glad I made this poll. I'm finding that I'm on the unpopular side of this one, and that explains why I'm seeing more matching headstocks these days.
I've always thought that painted headstocks look strange, and maple looks great with anything. Veneered (or painted) headstocks on three or five piece necks are perplexing to me, Show me those those natural pretty stripes that have been hiding behind the fretboard.
Last edited:
I picked carrots because they are good for you. °•°
However I have seen some cool contrasting headstock colors i.e black headstock on a deep red body or black headstock on a white body.
However I have seen some cool contrasting headstock colors i.e black headstock on a deep red body or black headstock on a white body.
Last edited:
If it HAS a headstock, sure (as I am thinning out the herd it looks like at least half of mine will be headless...)
For my personal taste, the only thing the headstock should match is the back of the neck.
Depends. Sometimes matching looks cheap, sometimes maple looks cheap.
I like the neck through Spector approach. Entire body and back of neck are same color.... Headstock still black.
I like the neck through Spector approach. Entire body and back of neck are same color.... Headstock still black.
