Ya know what? That does look good! But I was always crazy about redburst.I think that really looks good, sometimes (although it's only on the frontside).
View attachment 4333521
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ya know what? That does look good! But I was always crazy about redburst.I think that really looks good, sometimes (although it's only on the frontside).
View attachment 4333521
Don't do it! I feel nauseous already..I might go for three tone sunburst on my Jazz Bass headstock. I'd have to see it first.
Interesting! Considering it invariably costs more to get a matching headstock color or finish... what makes it seem cheaper to you? There must be some association.... a kid's instrument or something that had a matching headstock? I think we are all affected by toys and junk we've used, and it affects our choices as adults.I realize this is a minority opinion but I absolutely hate matching headstocks. I think it looks tacky and cheap. The only thing worse than a matching headstock is a painted neck. I have passed on basses that played really well because they had matching headstocks.
This is a good generalization. Exceptions abound, but so it is with all generalizations.Dark fretboard? Matching.
Maple fretboard? No matching.
IMHO a matched headplate is desirable over a fully 'painted' neck.Do y’all consider a headstock that is just painted on the face “matching?” I don’t, not really — I prefer the whole neck painted to match.
This is a good generalization. Exceptions abound, but so it is with all generalizations.
Sure.What about sparkle finishes?
View attachment 4333044
The two outside basses in the above pic have matching headstocks but the one on the right is a ginger burst.