• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

MEGA THREAD:: Favorite/Best Punk Bassist

erm...i think that we should stick to british bands 77 to 79 when we refer to the term "Punk" ...its not just thrashing with attitude ...its also a special moment in place and time which can never be recreated. Prehaps derivitive movements could now be refered to as "Post Punk". :smug:
 
well lets talk about the Stooges....what about the Velvets ...they all showed the way......youre grabbing at straws...of course there was other stuff going on...but Punk as such happened somewhere else.
 
zazz said:
erm...i think that we should stick to british bands 77 to 79 when we refer to the term "Punk" ...its not just thrashing with attitude ...its also a special moment in place and time which can never be recreated. Prehaps derivitive movements could now be refered to as "Post Punk". :smug:

Punk is what you want it to be. The pop-punk of today isn't really "punk" to me, but it fills the same role Minor Threat, The Circle Jerks and the Dead Kennedys did when I was a kid. If "punk" is just the British scene of 77-79 does that preclude the Ramones or the Germs, or even the Stooges for that matter? Or are they Pre-Post-Punk?

Sub-genre classification is so boring :rolleyes:
 
The Golden Boy said:
Punk is what you want it to be. The pop-punk of today isn't really "punk" to me, but it fills the same role Minor Threat, The Circle Jerks and the Dead Kennedys did when I was a kid. If "punk" is just the British scene of 77-79 does that preclude the Ramones or the Germs, or even the Stooges for that matter? Or are they Pre-Post-Punk?

Sub-genre classification is so boring :rolleyes:


Ouch your hurting my head!!!!!! :D Germs rule!! so bad theyre good! :smug: