Thanks again! What HPF do you use? I might try that to squeeze a little more clean headroom out of the WA. To be honest, I like the tone a little more than the WD800 so I still try to use it in as many situations as possible.I think the SW212 would be in the same tonal ballpark as the Berg CN212. IME over the years (and I started my WA journey with a 112 WA Scout combo so I'm a little biased) I've found the WA to typically be a best match with mainly the 12" loaded cabs. Before I get lectured that speaker diameter predicts nothing, let me just say that the 12" loaded cabs I've used/own tend to be voiced in a balanced way and/or with a less exaggerated emphasis on deep lows.
The WA without a HPF in the signal chain and especially when pushed volume-wise produces an abundance of lows that can quickly become unruly for me when using cabs that tend to emphasize deep lows. For whatever reason, I find 410 cabs voiced in a way that usually has some serious low end emphasis and many 15" loaded cabs do as well...although the GK Neo 115 was always a notable exception in that regard. It just seems like most cab builders seem to go for a more balanced sound/voicing in their 12" loaded cabs with some (e.g., Duke's AK Hathor and Changeling lines) even focusing the low end response more around the first harmonic and not the lower bass note fundamental frequencies (i.e., the 31-40 Hz range).
Given my experience with the SW112 I would say it can give you some deep lows if you dial that in, but it tends to be more inherently on the balanced/upper low to mid low focused side. For me this kind of cab or two of them (or a SW212) would offer a full low end with a good punch when used with the WA. Adding a HPF to that mix makes it even more capable IME.
I appreciate you taking a little time to share your experience Al. If you ever get a chance to try a WA with a SW 212 I would be curious to hear what you think.

Walkabout, 20 years old, we can start to call it vintage, no?