Amen. My old soundman always requested it pre-, which I did for a while. Then, I quietly switched it to post one night without telling him. He told me my bass sounded really good that night. Always use post eq since then.
I like the sound of my amp & cabs better than the sound of a pre- direct line. But, last night, there were already 12 mics on stage. I condsider it mercy to not force the soundman to have yet another source of ambient noise. Once the band is going, the nuances of tone tend to get lost anyway.
Then there's the cable hell. 4 vocals, 2 guitars, 3 keyboards, 5-piece drum kit + bass rig. Add in the monitors and PA cables, and that's a lot to trip over. (I run my wireless just to cut down on stage cables, and spend a fair amount of time during setup trying to make sure the guitards don't run cables in the areas where we're going to be standing. Why are bass players the only ones that understand efficiency? I can load in or out in one trip, but then have to make 30 more trips to get everybody else's stage gear and pa out. Another topic, I guess.)
On a small stage where I'm standing on top of my amp, the last thing I want is a mic stand to dodge. Post eq gives me a little bit of what my tone is. Of course, since I ran my bass and amp eq flat last night, I'm not too sure pre- or post- mattered.
A mic would be great, but I usually don't think its practical, particularly on a smaller stage. Plus, while I agree it generally sounds "better," I don't think "better" always matters in the mix. This is why my band tone is a little different from my personal practice tone - my "better" sound doesn't
quite work in the mix.
Oh, and when you don't play any better than I did last night, bass tone is the least of your problems.