Only people who play in real band situations should be allowed to write about performance of basses.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Only people who play in real band situations should be allowed to write about performance of basses.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
... thats an interesting concept ... you might have just eliminated 50-60 % of TB members, and probably a fair number of them pay supporting membership fees to keep this site up and running so people have a format to state their opinions, like who should be allowed to write about the performance of basses ...
.. I notice the comment is present tense ... I guess that would rule out some of the old timers I know that got burnt out living/playing on the road for 15-20 years, as they haven't played in a 'real band' situation for over 20 years now ... could be a loss not hearing what they have learned ...
.. while we are at it, how about we classify what is a 'real' band situation ... need to play out maybe 3-4 times a month? .. release a CD a year? ... gig in the neighbors back yard every summer for their teen daughters birthday??... jam in your parents basement 2x a week with kids from school?
.. maybe we should have a screening process prior to allowing anyone to post their opinion .. oh wait!, we do in some ways... its called a profile ... if you like/dont like what someone posts, take a minute and check their profile ... a certain amount of credibility can be establised from a completed profile if the information is offered... after someone is on TB a while, most likely develop a sense of which comments/posters tend to be the most credible to a situation, and which simply repeat what they saw/heard what someone else had to say ... but that doesn't mean they aren't entitled to say it ... in 5-10 years, they may be the 'informed' one on here sharing info that others are learning from ...
.. JMHO as always ...
Why? I'm interested and always wondered why many people chose MIM over MIA
I have all 3. Most MIM's are better than many of the other countries of manufacture, IMO.
Im lookinig into getting into my first Fender P bass and theres one im looking at thats a MIM fender and im not sure whats the difference from this one and any other kind of fender....somebody help me
Only people who play in real band situations should be allowed to write about performance of basses.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
Only people who play in real band situations should be allowed to write about performance of basses.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
Only people who play in real band situations should be allowed to write about performance of basses.
At home you cannot tell the differences.
does that include USA as well?
Ditto...price...I can get a bass that plays great and sounds great for much less. Especially when bought used...That being said, I'd love to save up for a Fender Select P-Bass, with the flame maple top. That is one sharp looking bass...One reason is $$$. Always a deciding factor in life. In my case I am just in love with my Road Worn Precision and when I have to record especially, that is what I take. I don't care where it is made because good...well is good! I have a 2013 American Standard Precision in sunburst/tort and I think it is near perfect in finish,fit etc but that Made in Mexico P (RW) is just better to me.
I have all 3. Most MIM's are better than many of the other countries of manufacture, IMO.
My new 2014 MIM Candy Apple Red Precision. Got it brand new at for only $365. I couldn't pass it up. It sounds pretty great. I have already ordered a set of TI Flats.
View attachment 613362