1-4: Agreed
5: I've owned a passive SUB and it was great, too. Apparently they're much rarer than the active models.
5: I've owned a passive SUB and it was great, too. Apparently they're much rarer than the active models.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh were ya? That'd be a trip.6. Strings. Using a .105 on the G string and finding it ok.
Some final comments (with respect to John Grey cheers) about the MM SUB bass before I buy a new P Bass.
5. Passive? I thought all MMs were active.
6. Strings. Using a .105 on the G string and finding it ok.
Oh were ya? That'd be a trip.



Some observations... the new pickguard is a .090 b/w/b compared to the diamond plate industrial that is maybe .030(?). I've always owned ebmm basses to slap 'em, and the new pickguard helps to cut down on the gap between body and strings making it easier to slap.
Looking forward to rockin' this baby tonight
I did mention I got this one for only $400, right???![]()
![]()

stupidly good for that cash eh? RAWK IT!!![]()
Oh man... I think there's gonna be about TEN JEALOUS BASSES in the stable! The SUB was rockin' it last night like crazy! This might just be the go-to bass for a long time to come...
Since I had a Stingray 5-er for so long, I'd like to give a brief comparo... Here's my observations:
Body: both the SUB and the SR are pretty hefty, but the weight is nicely balanced. The slab body of the SUB takes a little time to get used to when picking - the forearm hits the lower bout if I have the bass resting too high. Good thing I have the quick adjustable poly strap. The interesting part is that it is actually *more* comfortable playing the SUB with my fingers than the SR. I think it's because the slab body and the finish lets my forearm 'rest' on the bout...
Neck: Not much difference, except for the finished back on the SUB. I will say that the oiled neck on my old SR was purrr-fect, so I think this one is gonna go to the ol' Stingray. I know some SUB owners have rubbed out the back of the necks 'naturally', so maybe this one will do the same...
Electronics: Almost identical - Pickups have the classic MM sound - just makes me wanna slap this girl like a (insert analogy here). The SR had a 3-band and a 3-way switch, which I used to bump a little bass and leave everything else flat - I would only bump the treble for Tool or Rage tunes. The SUB has a 2-band pre; I'm not sure if they're boost/cut, or just boost since there's no detent on the knobs. All I did last night was run both the bass and treble mid-way, then give a slight bump like I used to do on the SR. I never used the 3-way switch before , so I certainly didn't miss it last night.
Aesthetics: I gotta admit; I LOVE the look of the SUB! The pickguard on the SR always kinda bugged... When I saw Louis Johnson play his MM back in the 70's, I fell in love with the SR bass. That egg-shaped pickguard just hits me in my soul...
I think the ladies like it too... Let me explain...
Random Young Babe: "You look hot!"
Me: "Really?!?"
Random Young Babe: "Yeah. I like old guys!"
<whimper>![]()

Ok... just put on the pickguard - damn, its suhweet!
Jmac nice job on the passive.
I have a similar jet black active.....came with the ugliest fake silver/chrome industrial pickguard imaginable. Thinking new black opal pickguard just might keep it.
hey that's the black on black i was talking about!!! ^^
shoulda grabbed it while i had the chance.![]()