TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
For the G C D progression it makes more sense to just think of the whole thing as being in G major (or the whole thing is G Ionian). Saying that the C would use the Lydian scale doesn't get you anywhere when that is just the same notes as you have in the key the whole song is in anyway, it just unnecessarily complicates things.
Where thinking "modes" makes sense to me is when the mode applies to the whole progression (or to a whole section of a song). So if your progression was centred on G but was actually G F C you could use G mixolydian across all three chords, because even over the G and C chords the melody probably would use an F natural rather than an F sharp.
If a song that is primarily G, F, and C chords is strongly "G centric" in the sense that it wants to resolve to G (as compared to just featuring a lot of G), I would say it is G mixolydian, not C major with a lot of V chord, and not G major with outside notes.But for the "G mixolydian" example - isn't this just a fancy way of saying the song is probably in the key of C, and that the G is the V chord, hence the F natural. Even if it is "G centric".
"C major but featuring the minor vi chord a lot"If a song that is primarily G, F, and C chords is strongly "G centric" in the sense that it wants to resolve to G (as compared to just featuring a lot of G), I would say it is G mixolydian, not C major with a lot of V chord, and not G major with outside notes.
It might seem like semantics, but if it helps to see where I'm coming from would you say that a song in A minor is really just in C major but featuring the minor vi chord a lot? I definitely wouldn't. I know you mentioned A Aeolian, but would it bother you to call that A minor? Such a tune may not even use any C chords.

But for the "G mixolydian" example - isn't this just a fancy way of saying the song is probably in the key of C, and that the G is the V chord, hence the F natural. Even if it is "G centric".
If a song that is primarily G, F, and C chords is strongly "G centric" in the sense that it wants to resolve to G (as compared to just featuring a lot of G), I would say it is G mixolydian, not C major with a lot of V chord, and not G major with outside notes.

Yep, exactly.I thought of a famous example of this type of chord progression: "Werewolves of London" by Warren Zevon. The chord progression is simply D, C, G over and over again. D, C, G, D, C, G.
"Werewolves of London" is in the key of D Major and is notated with 2 sharps. An accidental sign is used for all of the C naturals. This method uses slightly more ink than a 1 sharp key signature, but it has become the conventional method because it more accurately conveys the D Major tonality.
That's an interesting example.To my ear, Werewolves sounds more like it resolves to the G chord and feels like a G major tonality. From memory the recording fades out, but if I were to play it live I think I'd end it on a G chord. Though it's not really strongly G, I can see the argument for D.I thought of a famous example of this type of chord progression: "Werewolves of London" by Warren Zevon. The chord progression is simply D, C, G over and over again. D, C, G, D, C, G.
There is no normal way. Key signatures are up to the writer—they are just notational conventions, that can minimize the number of accidentals the notator must use.What is the normal way to notate songs that aren't Ionian or Aeolian?
Both statements are true.Is the following true? Given a song in G and it moves from a I to a IV...
- when the C is hit, i can theoretically noodle around on the lydian scale on C?
- If the song goes to the V, i can noodle on the mixolydian D scale. Is this right?
Yes.I am working on understanding modes. Is the following true.
Given a song in G and it moves from a I to a IV, when the C is hit, i can theoretically noodle around on the lydian scale on C. If the song goes to the V, i can noodle on the mixolydian D scale.
Is this right? Thank you
What is the normal way to notate songs that aren't Ionian or Aeolian?
Pretty much play chordal tones, passing notes and walking lines between chords. Looking to growSort of...but if you want the best from modes you need a fuller musical education...The more you have a fuller knowledge and understanding about music the more you will know and understand about modes....but if you know nothing really about music then you know nothing really about modes.
To get the best from modes you apply them to what you know musically...so if you know nothing you learn nothing.
Pretty much play chordal tones, passing notes and walking lines between chords. Looking to grow
I know you were agreeing with me, but...just checking what the melody notes are isn't enough. That's kind of the point of this thread: the same notes that are used in the G major scale are in the E (natural) minor scale, D mixolydian scale, C lydian, etc., so just matching the notes from the sheet music to a scale isn't going to tell you the mode used in the song.I've check the melody notes (from here), it's in G IMHO.
I know you were agreeing with me, but...just checking what the melody notes are isn't enough. That's kind of the point of this thread: the same notes that are used in the G major scale are in the E (natural) minor scale, D mixolydian scale, C lydian, etc., so just matching the notes from the sheet music to a scale isn't going to tell you the mode used in the song.
I've got kind of "cold" on all that MODE stuff, but...
Modes - it's not about some notes from a scale.
I'm not going to start one of my numerous comments/postings about those MODES.
Please, check this link, read it, and, should you have questions, we can discuss it.
http://www.lifesmith.com/BHWeb/Music Theory - Advanced.pdf