Mudd discovers flats, and also finds conflicts - opinions requested

Your trusted sources are wrong on this one. I recently bought a 1978 AutumnGlo 4001 Rickenbacker that wore flats for most of it's life and the frets are pretty close to new. I myself put the lightest set of pure Nickel Fender round wound strings on it. I wanted TI's flats but the local dealer quit selling them.

 

Frets last longer with FLATS.
Frets get ridges with roundwounds.
If you like the sound on an active bass; run with it.

IMHO; someone was probably thinking that flats get you the old school sound, therefore not needing the preamp... Active basses with preamps on the bass simply give the player more control and less eq-ing is then required through the amp....

 

I always assumed flats would be easier on frets but haven't done any scientific measurements to confirm or debunk that. (Could also have to do with the outer winding material - harder metal = more wear?)

Active basses generally provide a more high-fidelity response that some might say is wasted on flatwounds since they don't give as much "zing". I say, whatever - the active EQ and (8-year-old) TI flats work wonderfully together on my 5-string fretless.

 

That's probably based on that flatwounds, not having rounds, will have more contact area on the frets. Whether that wears them down faster or not, I have no answer.

 

Flats wear down frets less than rounds and that is why they are recommended for fretless basses. Also nickel wears down frets less than stainless because it is softer.

 

Flats are much easier on frets than rounds.

 

First off, roundwounds will wear down you frets faster than flats, if your talking about a fifteen or twenty year period using your bass every day for 3 to 4 hours per day...every day. But if you use your bass like mose bassists, even preofessionals, you won' see much of a difference. I've played bass since 1966, and used rounds (rotosound RS66) up until 5 or 6 years ago with the same bass (Gibson EB3) and haven't had any problems. I now use flats (LeBella 'Deep talkin" flats) exclusivily. I love the sound and tension (just my humble opinion), but use your own opinion and feel, and don't be swayed by others. Like the man said....Make your own sound, ....and make it yours!

 

how do you know they're nickel? 90% of flats are steel..

 

Brite flats have, to the best of my recollection, blue wraps. GHS Precision flats have purple wraps. It's been ten years since I used Brite flats, so I may be hazy on that.

 

Not that I will ever use my bass so much as to wear out my frets...but I look at it this way......which string is harder on the fingers. Flats or rounds? Should be the same to frets...no?

Cheers,
BT

 

brite flats are not flats, they are groundwounds. Precision flats are flats and have purple wraps. As far as flats on an active, I have ghs precision flats on my stingray 5 now and can't be more pleased. I had TI's on there but they did not work well on this bass. As for fret wear, if the frets wear down, get a refret. But play what you need to play to get the sound you want. I don't think you'll have a problem with fret wear any more with flats (probably less so) than with rounds.

 

The TI stands for Thomastik-Infeld, their maker.

 

Flats are pretty awesome. they can (but not always) cause a bit of fret buzz, just because. But, 99.9999% of the time you wont notice.

I rock flats for aggressive industrial bass noise. Especially if you really spank them with a pick.

 

I have GHS Pressurewounds on my Sterling. They feel very comfortable and have all the brightness I could want. I will try some Brite Flats for comparison, but the EQ will let me shape the sound any way I want.

 

I have D'Addario Chromes on my 5-string Sadowsky (active) and it rocks! I can get as bright as I need to, and I have loads of attack and fundamental.