They are doing like Ibanez, 35.5-34”. After playing a Dingwall NG3, I say copy Dingwall and do the 37-33” for sixes and 37-34” for fives spread. It sounds massive!
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
View attachment 3663300
They are doing like Ibanez, 35.5-34”. After playing a Dingwall NG3, I say copy Dingwall and do the 37-33” for sixes and 37-34” for fives spread. It sounds massive![/QUOTE) love it!!!I've never played mutiscale but that's be the one I'd like to start with!!
It’s real. Check out this link:Warwick Announces Rockbass Corvette Multi-Scale Five-String BassHoly poopie, is that for real? That's pretty much the dream bass.
They probably can’t make that huge of a jump in scale length without radically modifying that iconic body.View attachment 3663300
They are doing like Ibanez, 35.5-34”. After playing a Dingwall NG3, I say copy Dingwall and do the 37-33” for sixes and 37-34” for fives spread. It sounds massive!
I would bet that cort makes these along with the current ff Ibanez basses, and that's how the ibby basses are too. Cost saving measure.Why not extend the painted headstock to the the nut rather than leaving bare wood?
Why not extend the painted headstock to the the nut rather than leaving bare wood?
Like most manufacturers, they are trying to just add fanned frets to their existing design, and that only gets you so far. Not to sound like I've drank the kool-aid, but I guess I have. Dingwalls are built from the ground up to be fanned fret basses. They may have body shapes or other design elements that look similar to other basses, but once you get one in your hands, you can see, feel, and hear the difference.They probably can’t make that huge of a jump in scale length without radically modifying that iconic body.
Measuring from the nut to the twelfth fret, then doubling that measurement will give you your scale length,I just measured my rock bass..it early in the morning but pretty sure my e is 35.5".I'd like to play one. Curios
it’s no secret that I dislike headless basses, but a headless Thumb would be utter sacrilege. If Warwick ever does this, I would lose all respect for the company.I would rather see a headless Thumb bass or Streamer if they are trying to get trendy.
Like most manufacturers, they are trying to just add fanned frets to their existing design, and that only gets you so far. Not to sound like I've drank the kool-aid, but I guess I have. Dingwalls are built from the ground up to be fanned fret basses. They may have body shapes or other design elements that look similar to other basses, but once you get one in your hands, you can see, feel, and hear the difference.
Having said that, I think this Warwick looks great and I'm sure it is as nice a bass as every other German Warwick. (I have a Thumb BO5 that is great.)
EDIT: Oops. This is a Rockbass. They are decent to good, but IMO not great.