you know they judge music right? like the actual music. to get into music school and other programs.
I would think they are judging the student's ability to learn music and benefit from their program.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
you know they judge music right? like the actual music. to get into music school and other programs.
Contests or honestly any type of measurement applied to art is fully subjective.So, basically you are saying that every time someone is emotionally moved enough to decide that they like a thing, that thing has won some kind of a contest between all other things for that individual's attention. Right?
I mean... if so, okay. You can look at it like that, but it's kind of splitting hairs. What you are talking about is subjective.
Competition in the true sense is objective at a fundamental level. One either wins or loses based on some kind of standard of agreed upon measuring system.
How do you measure a guitar riff and compare it to another? The fastest? the most notes? which one is harder to play? Which one sold the most records? You have to APPLY some sort of yardstick based on business, athleticism, popularity or something that has nothing to do with music itself.
Music is about expression of sonic concepts and emotions through the medium of sound. It is best compared to a language. People either understand it or they don't. So how do you measure a language? If you base it upon how many people "get-it" then the crudest and most basic ones tend to rise to the top because they have the widest reach. And really, you just end up measuring the listener's ability to understand in the end.
No, it's ONE of the driving forces of success.Healthy Competitive nature is the driving force of success
What I’m saying is every day your band isn’t playing at (venue) someone else won that slot for any number of subjective but judged reasons. And any time your band is playing at (venue) you beat out dozens or even hundreds of bands for that slot.
Ha! I “objectively” believe RH is better than the Biebs!Usually those reasons are a measurement of liquor or ticket sales. Not musical content. And you'll find no argument from me that business is a competition.
But when you start handing trophies to artists as recognition for their art I think that sends a very bad message. It says this musician, in this year or in this talent show, is objectively better than all the other loser musicians who also were considered. I think thats a dangerous and offensive sort of thing to promote.
Let's consider Justin Bieber's "Baby Baby Baby" with Radiohead's "How to Dissapear Completely" If music is a competition then it should be very simple to measure those songs up and declare one as objectively better music than the other.
I would think they are judging the student's ability to learn music and benefit from their program.
It's incredibly easy for someone at retirement age with a net worth in the millions to have such standards.
Meanwhile, ask those nominated for best new artist if music is a competition. Ask those young hungry songwriters in Nashville if music is a competition. Ask guitar players about ti graduate with a (mostly useless) degree from prestigious music schools if music is a competition. Ask any studio musicians in music towns who aren't at the level of Sklar or Rhodes if music is a competition.
@BAG are you trying to make a living playing/writing music? Or do you have a career outside of music and do this for the fun and passion of it? If the former, and you're not already successful at it, you may want to start treating it as a competition.
Ha! I “objectively” believe RH is better than the Biebs!
EOB is one of my favorite guitarists too.
The only person I'm driven to compete with is myself. I want to do better next time, always. That seems to drive me toward success without having to stomp on the heads of vanquished enemies day after day.Healthy Competitive nature is the driving force of success
This is the thing. What is actually being measured is ultimately the taste of the listener. Cause there's a LOT of bubblegum chewing youngsters who would disagree with you and I about Radiohead's "boring" music. Pretty sure we are outnumbered. However there are college courses dedicated to the music of Radiohead. so...
I'm with Mr. Cave on this. Give those awards to some artist who needs to have an award to feel special. Or better yet, give it to whoever judged the competition. They are the ones who likely value it most.
Retirement age??? Born in 1957, Nick Cave turned 39 years old in 1996, when he wrote the letter.
Or you are just another american guy who does not bother reading even the first post before you HAVE to communicate something?
Retirement age??? Born in 1957, Nick Cave turned 39 years old in 1996, when he wrote the letter.
Or you are just another american guy who does not bother reading even the first post before you HAVE to communicate something?

You put it so much less delicately than I didEven though I agree, I keep thoughts like that to myself because they come across as pretentious garbage.
Someone’s gonna get that eventually.