@el murdoque you have a way with words. Even more so given I’m pretty sure English isn’t your native language. I don’t know where you come up with all these metaphors, but they are very entertaining. Hats off to you sir 
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
From that thread I'd conclude that there are several Keeley BD pedals with enhanced "phat" bass response... Ain't that your playfield?I always discounted these because of the lost low end.
This thread seems to confirm that:
anyone tried it?
i heard once that it's great for bass as well, but won't it eat all the low end?
hope this gets some replies. feel like trying one, but i'd like to hear some opinions first.
- farewelltowords
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Effects [BG]
It seems I'm blessed with visions ;-)@el murdoque you have a way with words. Even more so given I'm pretty sure English isn't your native language. I don't know where you come up with all these metaphors, but they are very entertaining. Hats off to you sir![]()
That's similar to what my family thinks of my English pronunciation...I'm not a native speaker, just an enthusiastic hobbyist. If this forum was audio based, you'd spot my horrible accent from a mile off.
There are non-Boss versions that work well, if you like the core Blues Driver flavour. I have a DMB Stellar Drive, the 4-knob version with separate clean and wet volume controls, allowing you to have as much of your unadulterated signal as you’d like. I have a couple of pedals with this wet-dry configuration rather than a single blend knob, and it does allow for more flexibility. Sadly, the Stellar Drive (especially the 4-knob) was pretty rare even when it was being built, but since the company folded in around 2014, there aren’t many around. I don’t go looking any more, but they used to come up on Reverb from time to time.I always discounted these because of the lost low end.
This thread seems to confirm that:
anyone tried it?
i heard once that it's great for bass as well, but won't it eat all the low end?
hope this gets some replies. feel like trying one, but i'd like to hear some opinions first.
- farewelltowords
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Effects [BG]
It seems I'm blessed with visions ;-)
Most of the ideas actually pop into my head, at least the core - all I have to do is wrap some words around them - and you are justified in your suspicions.
I'm not a native speaker, just an enthusiastic hobbyist. If this forum was audio based, you'd spot my horrible accent from a mile off.
I think that’s a low-ball estimate, if only because the huge majority of those who have left the education system barely write at all (increasingly, along with a sizeable minority of those still in it).The good thing about writing is the accent is much less distinct. Seriously, you write better than at least 70% of native English speakers.
I think that’s a low-ball estimate, if only because the huge majority of those who have left the education system barely write at all (increasingly, along with a sizeable minority of those still in it).
Now why on Earth would you go and do that?? I have it on good authority the guy is a total idiot, and not to be trusted....The other is, boringly, a suggestion by @sloppy_phil
Shhh. He'll probably read this and go and get all offended.Now why on Earth would you go and do that?? I have it on good authority the guy is a total idiot, and not to be trusted....
Ah, I suspect an IdiotBox pedal incoming...Now why on Earth would you go and do that?? I have it on good authority the guy is a total idiot, and not to be trusted....
Don't worry. In the short time here on TB where there was a flag displayed in the corner of the user avatar, that guy had a maple leaf on red/white/red on his.Shhh. He'll probably read this and go and get all offended.
I recall the Meatsmoke amp I jammed on in my old rehearsal space have a lot of "pillow" down low, in fact I'd say that was its main consistent character attribute that I was able to dial in and I found it difficult to get the sharper midrange presence I sought from it (to be fair I didn't RTFM or anything so may have been missing something obvious dialing it in). In that respect it was similar to the Aguilar DB750 I owned around that time (which seemed to also have a Fender-based tonestack, at least in the Bass/Treble controls), though the DB750 felt punchier in the lows (in an almost nauseating way sometimes! there was an upper-bass/lower-mid hump in the Aguilar that could really be fatiguing to stand in front of for too long and was difficult to dial out without neutering the punch too much for my taste). "Massive and smooth" is how I recall the Meatsmoke in amp form. I do suspect that amp may have not been in the best bias/shape, as I knew the owner of that amp to be pretty uneducated and irresponsible with his gear. I'd definitely be interested to play around with the preamp version.I FINALLY managed to play the Meatsmoke in a band mix.
One thing of concern is, of course, that the tone stack that comes into play here is unable to boost mids in any way, essentially giving you a bathtub EQ unless you run it flat. Since I did need a proper DI out, I ran the Meatsmoke into the Origin Bassrig Super Vintage with a solid boost in the mids, set to 800Hz. Pitted against hard hit drums and searing metal guitars, the behemoth is not impressed. I said it sounded organic when I played it at home and organic it stayed in the band context. The sizzle reminds of angry insects. A swarm of locusts going ape poopie. But there's more to it than just the sizzle. The sheer heft is unbelievable. You know dirt pedals that drop out the low end. Those are great for guitar players to leave us more room. The Meatsmoke creates a sonic foundation to build a skyscraper on. The booty is so fat, all the your mama jokes fade in comparison. It flaps your pants, it shakes the air, there's just so much of it. It's an unwieldy beast, not fit for the combat that is called 'cutting through the mix'. Where your average Darkglass pedal is a shiny robot, made of white plastic and polished steel, that deals strikes with surgical precision, exactly and only to the spots that deal the most damage, the Meatsmoke is a misshapen mutant of elephant, rhino and a bunch of insects that can claim no such precision. When it strikes, though, it strikes with such force and ferocious energy that after impact, it only leaves a crater. It certainly hit those parts that deal most damage, along with all the other parts as well.
It does kinda sound like the one I got.I recall the Meatsmoke amp I jammed on in my old rehearsal space have a lot of "pillow" down low, in fact I'd say that was its main consistent character attribute that I was able to dial in and I found it difficult to get the sharper midrange presence I sought from it (to be fair I didn't RTFM or anything so may have been missing something obvious dialing it in). In that respect it was similar to the Aguilar DB750 I owned around that time (which seemed to also have a Fender-based tonestack, at least in the Bass/Treble controls), though the DB750 felt punchier in the lows (in an almost nauseating way sometimes! there was an upper-bass/lower-mid hump in the Aguilar that could really be fatiguing to stand in front of for too long and was difficult to dial out without neutering the punch too much for my taste). "Massive and smooth" is how I recall the Meatsmoke in amp form. I do suspect that amp may have not been in the best bias/shape, as I knew the owner of that amp to be pretty uneducated and irresponsible with his gear. I'd definitely be interested to play around with the preamp version.
Shhh. He'll probably read this and go and get all offended.
It's hard to be mad about too many things when you are drip fed maple syrup and legal cannabis all day every day!Don't worry. In the short time here on TB where there was a flag displayed in the corner of the user avatar, that guy had a maple leaf on red/white/red on his.
Unless you talk dirt about hockey, decant maple juice with a wine decanter or refer to them as the 51st state, they are pretty hard to upset!
I thought that this was inbred on a level that goes deeper than mere preferences - but you learn something new every day. There are Canadians not into hockey.It's hard to be mad about too many things when you are drip fed maple syrup and legal cannabis all day every day!
The irony is you can sh!t-talk hockey all you like; it may be the only sport we as a country are consistently good at, but I just don't like it. Well, maybe if Toronto had a team that wasn't focused on milking maximum profit out of fans for a group of overpaid, primadonna players that is nowhere near ever winning anything.... eh. I'll stick to my "futbol" thanks!
So, @el murdoque the prose is full of lovely flowers as per usual, but what is the takeaway from the rehearsal? Is it gonna be worth blowing up the whole board to include this behemoth, or does the DCX appear to work better in this context?