interesting! maybe thats what happened on the last set i had. It definitely have a lot of overtones on the B...thanks for the info.
Per your questions:
Pretty much +1 to Vic, but maybe with a little more nuance on my part.....
HC versus SC... different, not better or worse. The HC's are a bit deeper and have a bit more upper treble. The SC's are a bit tighter down low, a bit more mid present in general, and more 'grindy' in the upper mids/lower treble. While I prefer the SC's on the ash/maple Sadowsky's, the HC's are also great. Unless you find yourself searching for the mid control on your amp and constantly turning down the VTC, I would not bother swapping. However, if you feel your Sadowsky is a bit too scooped in the mids, and more to the sizzly side versus grindy side for your taste, it's an easy swap that really can make a difference.
Hi Beams... I LOVE them on the Sadowsky basses (really any J Bass). However, the B string is a complex issue for me. The way I use my B string is more of an extension of the E string, and to allow me to play some figures more comfortably in a different part of the neck, never above the Eb on the B string. For that type of playing, the Hi Beam B string is great and is as good as everything else MO and IME.
However, quite a few report some strange overtones, etc. as you move up the neck, and while this is a zero issue for me, in my noodling around to check this out, I can hear it also a bit as you move up into the 10th fret+ region of the instrument. I think part of this might be the low tension of the Hi Beams, which is usually something most want to avoid on a B string. However, if you use the B like I do, it sounds great.. plenty of grind down low, even C and below.
I really like the Sadowsky Blue label on these basses also. Tight tension, and a much harsher upper mid response and punch versus the Hi Beam that can sound a bit 'forward' whe playing solo, but can really punchy your top end through a busy guitar/drum mix.
IMO... all good stuff. Enjoy that bass!!!!!!!!
