Okay, I listened to the clips again. As I said, I'm using VERY small, inexpensive computer speakers.
Nonetheless, there is a difference in sound. The GK sounds more "scooped". Was the "contour" in fact, set straight up?
The Mesa sounds a bit "fatter". But I'm wondering if it is just slightly louder, giving the illusion of more meatiness. Again, if the GK's EQ was scooped, this would reduce its volume - especially in the mids.
Which ties into my final observation: To me, the two amps sound more alike in the lower register (beginning of the sound files) and more different from each other in the mid and upper mid departments.
At the end of the day, both heads sound good. And has been astutely pointed out, each could probably be adjusted to sound like the other. I have to say I prefer the Mesa's built-in tone just by a hair. And I currently play a GK MB500!
Great. More stuff to buy. I'm supposed to be saving up for a new bass!
Nonetheless, there is a difference in sound. The GK sounds more "scooped". Was the "contour" in fact, set straight up?
The Mesa sounds a bit "fatter". But I'm wondering if it is just slightly louder, giving the illusion of more meatiness. Again, if the GK's EQ was scooped, this would reduce its volume - especially in the mids.
Which ties into my final observation: To me, the two amps sound more alike in the lower register (beginning of the sound files) and more different from each other in the mid and upper mid departments.
At the end of the day, both heads sound good. And has been astutely pointed out, each could probably be adjusted to sound like the other. I have to say I prefer the Mesa's built-in tone just by a hair. And I currently play a GK MB500!
Great. More stuff to buy. I'm supposed to be saving up for a new bass!
