• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Nano Cortex One Month Review (Long😔)

Rockgeezer

Supporting Member
Jan 4, 2013
160
488
Venice, Florida
So as the title implies, I have over one month of hands-on experience with the Nano Cortex and figured I’d put down my thoughts and opinions at this stage. These are purely my subjective takes on this device and realize each individual could have vastly different thoughts on the pedal but here’s what I’ve come up with over the past month, on small stages with my bar band along with ticketed, large production venues and stages throughout Florida with my tribute band. I apologize for the length of this post but I just kept writing what I was thinking and it ended up being a book…..🥴 hopefully you’ll take something from it all that may help in your decision to buy or pass.

First off, for me this is NOT a one-pedal-for all needs on bass. I didn’t expect it to be after much reading and research before I bought it from Sweetwater. This was added to my pedalboard as a main tonal device and an enhancement to my setup. My pedalboard for the past three years has centered around my HX Stomp XL and has been solid, roadworthy and without issue. My go-to block chain prest consisted of Ampeg Opti compressor, Ampeg 4 SVT Pro amp, (no cabinet), effects loop block and Noble model block. My effects were chorus, phaser, octaver and envelope filter running on a parallel path. I have been mostly satisfied during my time with this setup.

Before this pedalboard setup and going mostly ampless on stage I was using a TC Electronic RH750 rack mounted amp into a Barefaced Big Twin T cabinet and was very happy with the power, punch and tone of this rig, probably the best tone I’ve had in 40+ years of playing. It was a large part of my decision to try the Nano to capture that specific tone I very much enjoyed. And as with many who are getting older, I looked to scale back on weight, size and setup. That led me to my pedalboard. I considered buying the Quad Cortex when it came out but quickly realized it would be possibly a year waiting for inventory at Sweetwater so decided against it. My main point of interest in that device was the capability of the neural captures of my RH750 amp as well as my little Markbass CMD 121 combo I use for rehearsals as well as small stage gigs with my bar band, separate from my larger large production tribute act where I use only the pedalboard or with my GR Bass active cabinet. But…..the cost continued to hold me back, along with the back ordered status. That led me to buying this Nano Cortex.

Having that capture feature in a unit around a third of the price caused me to jump on the purchase from Sweetwater just as soon as I saw they had them in stock. I figured I’d better jump on it since it would probably quickly end up being out of stock like the Quad Cortex did when it first came out. Glad I did that since it was indeed showing back ordered only a couple days after the initial stock was sold out.

The learning curve is extremely quick and easy, much less than the Quad Cortex I would assume because of the scaled down and limited set of features. As I mentioned previously, I got this pedal mainly for a couple reasons, to do neural captures of some of my amps, along with the large iCloud files of factory and user captures available, plus ability to use cabinet IR’s. Plus, reaching down for quick tone tweaking if needed. So…..I captured my amps, played around with a large number of user captures and IR’s and played around with it through headphones, into my GR Bass AT 212 Slim Active 800 cabinet and through a PA. First couple gigs I used my captures plus rotated through a couple other captures from iCloud selections including Aguilar, Ampeg and GK amps. On about my third gig I used a simple capture of a Noble Tube DI listed as Noble 50% gain. I am currently going back and forth with this capture and my own amp captures. Sometimes a simpler preset is the best. I’m now using my HX Stomp XL as solely my effects unit plus the effects loop it has for a looper and a compact drum machine used only in the tribute band during a solo spot. I attached a pic of the current pedalboard setup and it is doing everything I want it to do.

The pros are:
-Great build quality
-Excellent sound quality
-Compact size
-Ability to tweak EQ/Gain/Volume on the fly using device knobs
-Ability to lock the pedal so knobs can’t be bumped and only the two foot switches are active to choose the four presets
-Quality sounding chorus, delay and reverb
-Simple, easy to set noise gate
-Accurate Tracking pitch transposer that can also provide a good Octaver
-HPF (high pass filter) and LPF ( low pass filter)
-Headphone with volume control
-MIDI/Footswitch jack (I don’t use)
-Balanced R/L outs using TRS to XLR for FOH input
-Ability to capture amps, cabs, OD pedals with no extra gear needed
-Bluetooth app which mirrors pedal in real time, accesses iCloud and library captures and IR’s and allows tweaking of parameters

The cons are:
-Fixed pre and post effects order
-Limited effects
-No overdrive/distortion effect
-No touch screen
-Only four footswitchable presets without going into app
-Limited tuner function without using app

For me, this is the type of add-on pedal
which enhances my pedalboard and gives me the ability to try and use quite a lot of captures, which was my primary interest in this unit. It is not, in my opinion a one-pedal-does-everything due to the limits on the effects and foot switchable limit to four, along with the inability to toggle effects on and off. But….in my setup, that’s where my HX Stomp does the dedicated effects switching so I get my accurate captures and quick basic tweaking in real time from the Nano along with any effects from the Stomp. Plus utilizing the effects loop in the Stomp for my looper and drum pedal also fills that need for my situation.

Would I recommend the Nano Cortex?…..Absolutely, along with the caveat that it should be a unit to be added to your setup if it meets YOUR specific needs. If you are looking to do captures of favorite amps/cabs and OD pedals without the need to purchase additional gear and want to explore the hundreds of iCloud captures then it is a wonderful piece of equipment. I would assume the cons I listed are probably a bit more possible deal breakers with guitarists rather than bassists. Once again, it meets my very specific needs since I don’t need a lot of presets or changes in tones. Sorry again for the long review here, appreciate you reading and deciding on your own for your specific setup and needs. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0883.jpeg
    IMG_0883.jpeg
    2.4 MB · Views: 334
Nice review. I have been intrigued by this unit. Regarding the no OD/distortion though can you not just have a capture of a sound that is overdriven and flip between the clean and that using a footswitch?
Yes, you can have a capture of something clean and a capture with overdrive/distortion/fuzz and switch between them. The left foot switch chooses presets 1A and 1B and the right one selects 2A or 2B. So you are limited to four presets using the foot switches. The pedal has room for 64 presets, 25 captures and 5 impulse responses. You choose a capture to make a preset, then you can either add or pass on an IR, noise gate, pitch transpose, HPF, LPF, chorus, delay and reverb. Give the preset a name and save it plus assign it to a foot switch if you want to access it that way.
 
Great review! I have been considering getting and using one simply to capture my amp settings and use it as a last in my signal chain on my pedal board to feed my IEM rig and FOH as opposed to using an amp and cab on stage. I don't do much knob-dicking on stage with my amps so it sounds like it would be perfect for my application.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockgeezer
Nice review. I'm happy the Nano is working well for you.

Apologies for derailing the thread, but I have a question about your previous Helix signal path. Do you mean you was running the SVT model into the Nobel model instead of a cab block or eq block? If so, I'm intrigued to try this. I'm currently running the SVT Pro into a cab with the Nobel on a parallel path. It sounds good, but I'm also exploring new options. Previously I just used the SVT Pro into a simple eq to top and tail the signal.

Also, you mention you run the effects parallel. So these didn't go through the SVT/Nobel chain? i.e.
Ampeg Opti comp >SVT Pro >, effects loop block > Noble
Then a separate path with chorus > phaser> octaver > envelope filter
 
Great review! I have been considering getting and using one simply to capture my amp settings and use it as a last in my signal chain on my pedal board to feed my IEM rig and FOH as opposed to using an amp and cab on stage. I don't do much knob-dicking on stage with my amps so it sounds like it would be perfect for my application.
Yes, would work very well for that. Like you, my specific needs aren’t a lot so it fills the bill nicely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BaltBass5
Nice review. I'm happy the Nano is working well for you.

Apologies for derailing the thread, but I have a question about your previous Helix signal path. Do you mean you was running the SVT model into the Nobel model instead of a cab block or eq block? If so, I'm intrigued to try this. I'm currently running the SVT Pro into a cab with the Nobel on a parallel path. It sounds good, but I'm also exploring new options. Previously I just used the SVT Pro into a simple eq to top and tail the signal.

Also, you mention you run the effects parallel. So these didn't go through the SVT/Nobel chain? i.e.
Ampeg Opti comp >SVT Pro >, effects loop block > Noble
Then a separate path with chorus > phaser> octaver > envelope filter
Yes, my signal chain had the compressor first, then a split to a parallel path. Signal on top row went to the SVT 4Pro and no cab block. I tried different cabs and did not like the more muffled tone. On the bottom parallel path I had the 70’s chorus, script 90 phaser, tron envelope filter and octaver. Then I joined the paths back up and went into the effects loop block and the Noble model block at the end as a final little eq and gain tweak if needed. For me this retained the basic amp tone of the 4Pro without altering from the effects. I could also dial in the mix of main tone and effects at that rejoined path point if needed. I did not have any eq block since my choice of the 4Pro gave me the basic eq controls plus the added graphic eq capability of that specific amp. It worked very well that way, I just wanted to try and do these captures of amps I had used and liked and why I got the Nano Cortex. Hope I explained well enough, if not just let me know. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kengleason
Yes, my signal chain had the compressor first, then a split to a parallel path. Signal on top row went to the SVT 4Pro and no cab block. I tried different cabs and did not like the more muffled tone. On the bottom parallel path I had the 70’s chorus, script 90 phaser, tron envelope filter and octaver. Then I joined the paths back up and went into the effects loop block and the Noble model block at the end as a final little eq and gain tweak if needed. For me this retained the basic amp tone of the 4Pro without altering from the effects. I could also dial in the mix of main tone and effects at that rejoined path point if needed. I did not have any eq block since my choice of the 4Pro gave me the basic eq controls plus the added graphic eq capability of that specific amp. It worked very well that way, I just wanted to try and do these captures of amps I had used and liked and why I got the Nano Cortex. Hope I explained well enough, if not just let me know. Thanks.
Thanks, that's helpful.

I find that drives and fuzzes in particular need taming in the top end - a high cut usually works - but I could never get the treble quite right with the SVT4Pro eq alone. I didn't get on with cab blocks either until recently. I've got them working well at the moment, but as I say, I still like to experiment with other ideas.
 
Thanks, that's helpful.

I find that drives and fuzzes in particular need taming in the top end - a high cut usually works - but I could never get the treble quite right with the SVT4Pro eq alone. I didn't get on with cab blocks either until recently. I've got them working well at the moment, but as I say, I still like to experiment with other ideas.
Yep….it never stops….😝
 
So as the title implies, I have over one month of hands-on experience with the Nano Cortex and figured I’d put down my thoughts and opinions at this stage. These are purely my subjective takes on this device and realize each individual could have vastly different thoughts on the pedal but here’s what I’ve come up with over the past month, on small stages with my bar band along with ticketed, large production venues and stages throughout Florida with my tribute band. I apologize for the length of this post but I just kept writing what I was thinking and it ended up being a book…..🥴 hopefully you’ll take something from it all that may help in your decision to buy or pass.

First off, for me this is NOT a one-pedal-for all needs on bass. I didn’t expect it to be after much reading and research before I bought it from Sweetwater. This was added to my pedalboard as a main tonal device and an enhancement to my setup. My pedalboard for the past three years has centered around my HX Stomp XL and has been solid, roadworthy and without issue. My go-to block chain prest consisted of Ampeg Opti compressor, Ampeg 4 SVT Pro amp, (no cabinet), effects loop block and Noble model block. My effects were chorus, phaser, octaver and envelope filter running on a parallel path. I have been mostly satisfied during my time with this setup.

Before this pedalboard setup and going mostly ampless on stage I was using a TC Electronic RH750 rack mounted amp into a Barefaced Big Twin T cabinet and was very happy with the power, punch and tone of this rig, probably the best tone I’ve had in 40+ years of playing. It was a large part of my decision to try the Nano to capture that specific tone I very much enjoyed. And as with many who are getting older, I looked to scale back on weight, size and setup. That led me to my pedalboard. I considered buying the Quad Cortex when it came out but quickly realized it would be possibly a year waiting for inventory at Sweetwater so decided against it. My main point of interest in that device was the capability of the neural captures of my RH750 amp as well as my little Markbass CMD 121 combo I use for rehearsals as well as small stage gigs with my bar band, separate from my larger large production tribute act where I use only the pedalboard or with my GR Bass active cabinet. But…..the cost continued to hold me back, along with the back ordered status. That led me to buying this Nano Cortex.

Having that capture feature in a unit around a third of the price caused me to jump on the purchase from Sweetwater just as soon as I saw they had them in stock. I figured I’d better jump on it since it would probably quickly end up being out of stock like the Quad Cortex did when it first came out. Glad I did that since it was indeed showing back ordered only a couple days after the initial stock was sold out.

The learning curve is extremely quick and easy, much less than the Quad Cortex I would assume because of the scaled down and limited set of features. As I mentioned previously, I got this pedal mainly for a couple reasons, to do neural captures of some of my amps, along with the large iCloud files of factory and user captures available, plus ability to use cabinet IR’s. Plus, reaching down for quick tone tweaking if needed. So…..I captured my amps, played around with a large number of user captures and IR’s and played around with it through headphones, into my GR Bass AT 212 Slim Active 800 cabinet and through a PA. First couple gigs I used my captures plus rotated through a couple other captures from iCloud selections including Aguilar, Ampeg and GK amps. On about my third gig I used a simple capture of a Noble Tube DI listed as Noble 50% gain. I am currently going back and forth with this capture and my own amp captures. Sometimes a simpler preset is the best. I’m now using my HX Stomp XL as solely my effects unit plus the effects loop it has for a looper and a compact drum machine used only in the tribute band during a solo spot. I attached a pic of the current pedalboard setup and it is doing everything I want it to do.

The pros are:
-Great build quality
-Excellent sound quality
-Compact size
-Ability to tweak EQ/Gain/Volume on the fly using device knobs
-Ability to lock the pedal so knobs can’t be bumped and only the two foot switches are active to choose the four presets
-Quality sounding chorus, delay and reverb
-Simple, easy to set noise gate
-Accurate Tracking pitch transposer that can also provide a good Octaver
-HPF (high pass filter) and LPF ( low pass filter)
-Headphone with volume control
-MIDI/Footswitch jack (I don’t use)
-Balanced R/L outs using TRS to XLR for FOH input
-Ability to capture amps, cabs, OD pedals with no extra gear needed
-Bluetooth app which mirrors pedal in real time, accesses iCloud and library captures and IR’s and allows tweaking of parameters

The cons are:
-Fixed pre and post effects order
-Limited effects
-No overdrive/distortion effect
-No touch screen
-Only four footswitchable presets without going into app
-Limited tuner function without using app

For me, this is the type of add-on pedal
which enhances my pedalboard and gives me the ability to try and use quite a lot of captures, which was my primary interest in this unit. It is not, in my opinion a one-pedal-does-everything due to the limits on the effects and foot switchable limit to four, along with the inability to toggle effects on and off. But….in my setup, that’s where my HX Stomp does the dedicated effects switching so I get my accurate captures and quick basic tweaking in real time from the Nano along with any effects from the Stomp. Plus utilizing the effects loop in the Stomp for my looper and drum pedal also fills that need for my situation.

Would I recommend the Nano Cortex?…..Absolutely, along with the caveat that it should be a unit to be added to your setup if it meets YOUR specific needs. If you are looking to do captures of favorite amps/cabs and OD pedals without the need to purchase additional gear and want to explore the hundreds of iCloud captures then it is a wonderful piece of equipment. I would assume the cons I listed are probably a bit more possible deal breakers with guitarists rather than bassists. Once again, it meets my very specific needs since I don’t need a lot of presets or changes in tones. Sorry again for the long review here, appreciate you reading and deciding on your own for your specific setup and needs. Thanks!

Never apologise for good work … folks who don’t want to read it don’t have to. Nice job 👍🏼
Couldn’t agree more! Nice job! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockgeezer
How is the Nano’s Transpose vs the HX’s Poly Pitch/Capo?
I didn’t really use the Poly/Capo in my HX Stomp XL but am using the pitch transpose in the nana cortex for an octaver which tracks very well. I also did set up a few presets with one or two semitones down and they also track well and sound natural with low enough latency that it’s not noticeable to me even with some speedy riffing so I wouldn’t hesitate to use them if the need came up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: v-12
Great post. I too have been intrigued by the new modeling pedals out there and when the NC hit, I went for it. I figured I would share my experience also with the Nanocortex (NC for short…)

I don’t regret buying it, but once it was on my pedalboard and after I goofed around with it a while I also saw it’s limitations. I tried a bunch of captures from the cloud but none fit my bands “sound”.

So…I tried the dumbest thing I could think of…capture my BDDI…and it sounds great!

So why did I just drop coin to model a pedal that’s already on my board to get the tone that works? Why not just keep the BDDI and return the NC? I didn’t return the NC, but it lives in its box on the shelf and the BDDI is still on my board. I can and will use it for guitar tracking and such because it’s really a great processor. I will integrate it somehow, but for now…I’m gonna stick to what’s working for me fwiw…
 
Yep, if you accept its limitations and use it for what it is, I think it is a compelling little device. The form factor is great.

I posted this in another thread but here's who I am using the Nano.

On my Quad Cortex my main bass tone is the combination of 3 different captures and a touch of Cortex built in reverb. With the Nano Cortex you can only have one capture at a time in the chain. That is a bummer.... but I just connected my Quad Cortex to the Nano Cortex and did a capture of my typical chain which includes multiple captures. The end result is one capture on the Nano Capture. You can't tell a difference between the Quad Cortex path containing the 3 individual captures and the single capture on the Nano. That's cool!

This means that the Nano Cortex is now outputting the exact same tone I typically use the Quad Cortex for.

Here's the capture I made if you are interested in giving it a try on your Nano. Neural DSP Technologies - Algorithmically Perfect
That out to FOH is all I need. Oh, and a compressor in front! :D Gain it up if you want a bit more growl.
 
Yep, if you accept its limitations and use it for what it is, I think it is a compelling little device. The form factor is great.

I posted this in another thread but here's who I am using the Nano.

On my Quad Cortex my main bass tone is the combination of 3 different captures and a touch of Cortex built in reverb. With the Nano Cortex you can only have one capture at a time in the chain. That is a bummer.... but I just connected my Quad Cortex to the Nano Cortex and did a capture of my typical chain which includes multiple captures. The end result is one capture on the Nano Capture. You can't tell a difference between the Quad Cortex path containing the 3 individual captures and the single capture on the Nano. That's cool!

This means that the Nano Cortex is now outputting the exact same tone I typically use the Quad Cortex for.

Here's the capture I made if you are interested in giving it a try on your Nano. Neural DSP Technologies - Algorithmically Perfect
That out to FOH is all I need. Oh, and a compressor in front! :D Gain it up if you want a bit more growl.
Gonna try that out.

I was tempted by the Nano, I'm in a similar boat where I only really use a single capture and then maybe drop a little modulation or time based stuff etc in if I’m feeling fancy.

I love the ability to pop my separate drives, preamps and comps in the fx loops, particularly when recording so I can have a clean signal for reamping. With the Nano, I’d need to go back to using my Scarlett 2i2 and a DI in front. Still pretty manageable and waaaay more compact, I could keep my current Rockboard 3.0 and fit my other go to pedals on easy enough.

Then again, I don’t have any musical projects on the horizon so having a compact gig board ain’t a pressing concern.
 
As a follow up…I figured I would pass along where the NC stands in my never ending quest to find the perfect rig (or as my wife says…spend money haha). It on loop B and the rest is on loop A.

I tried using effects and such with my current band and found it doesn’t sound “right”, so…I’m shrinking my board. Here’s my current build (and what I consider to be absolute overkill).

IMG_5043.jpeg


It will be shrunk back down to “what’s important and needed” though. Killer rig though….just too much stuff I don’t use or need right now.
 
Does it sound good? Does it feel good to play into?

Unlike you braver cats, I can't yet get my head round the thought of playing on stage without a physical amp! But I love the idea of capturing my Phil Jones amp, storing it in one of these for use at home

I just want something with awesome sound quality I can use at home for recording and practising. I'm not bothered about hundreds of possibilities, so the infinite palette the HX Stomp offers would give me too much anxiety! The Tech 21 Fly Rig looks great, and was top of list until I came across this.

My question is, has anyone done much recording with it?I gather that if you USB it to your DAW, it records both the clean DI and amp sim (inc. FX etc) as separate channels. Apparently it's super easy to send the clean signal back into the NC to reamp all though USB. Sounds ace to me.
 
So…..this is a little follow up to my original very long winded take on the Nano Cortex when I got it. As many of you know, a new 2.0 update was released yesterday, 4/25/25. I updated and tweaked it and used it last night and today on a couple gigs. Let me just say this update was unexpected with zero pre announcements to let us know it was coming. Updates include 47 additional effects and processing item. Additional overdrives, choruses, reverbs, eq’s, delays and many others. Also, noise gate was put in its own slot at the beginning to free up a block. One helpful change is the ability to now place effects in different spots instead of specific ones which helps with one of the biggest gripes about this unit. Some things like pitch transpose can still only occupy slot one and certain things are still only available in either pre or post of your captures and IRs but the ability to move many of them around is a huge benefit. I was using the Nano as my basic amp sound having captured a favorite amp of mine and then using my HX Stomp XL for a few effects. I am now going to scale my increasingly bloated pedalboard back and eliminate my HX Stomp XL, my Empress bass compressor and my Broughton HPF (high pass filter). For me, the choruses and addition of the new phaser has allowed me to ditch those other units and reduce my pedalboard significantly. I now use the SSL (solid state comp), the 229 chorus and the phase 95 in my presets and the results these past two gigs have been more than I could have hoped for. I’ll cut this short for now and say, like in my original post, this is solely a subjective issue and your application, instrument and configuration can be wildly different but my short time with this unit and new update has allowed it to finally be my all-in-one bass workstation and the free update has opened it up to me getting all the results that I require for my current band and song situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Tay_ and pbass62

Latest posts