Oh, it's not. Can't find mine though.It doesn't look like a terrible thick book.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh, it's not. Can't find mine though.It doesn't look like a terrible thick book.
Just to change colors, my 1981 tobacco burst with mahogany body.
View attachment 3550575
Is that original finish? If so I never saw that one. If not, nice choice!
Is that original finish? If so I never saw that one. If not, nice choice!
That's gorgeous
The switch and on my 81 is a 3way one. Humbucking-single coil- single coil with bass boost.The original L1000 had parallel, single-coil & OMG options on a 3-way switch.
We're saying the same thing. Single-coil w/bass boost has been dubbed "OMG" for many internet years now - with good reason!The switch and on my 81 is a 3way one. Humbucking-single coil- single coil with bass boost.
Any technically oriented brain out there can explain how the high and bass boosters work with no preamp or battery? It's the only passive bass I know with this kind of tonal options . Are there any brands doing similar things these days? Just curious
The bass and treble controls are actually passive RC circuits and cut only, not boost. That is true for both the L1000 and the active L2000 (tone controls work exactly the same in active and passive modes). It's common for people to assume they are boost controls because the pickups have so much output.
Oohhhhh! So the "open" tone of the pickups would be with both "boosters" all the way up, not the other way around?? Fascinating
And a final questio regarding all this. If the EQ bit of the circuit is identical on L1000 and L2000, why the need of a battery and preamp on the L2000?? Couldnt they have made it passive too? Just wondering!The bass and treble controls are actually passive RC circuits and cut only, not boost. That is true for both the L1000 and the active L2000 (tone controls work exactly the same in active and passive modes). It's common for people to assume they are boost controls because the pickups have so much output.
And a final questio regarding all this. If the EQ bit of the circuit is identical on L1000 and L2000, why the need of a battery and preamp on the L2000?? Couldnt they have made it passive too? Just wondering!
Not that I'd wish to argue with Leo, but many of us enjoy running our G&L's passive. Thankfully, we have that option.The G&L passive treble/bass cut EQ is a little unconventional, but does sound great. I have a 1983 El Toro with a similar layout as the L2000, though the EL Toro preamp has more treble baked in, even in 'normal' mode. I did a small resistor mod to tame it.
Leo was big on active bass design, as he saw it as taking the bass to the next (modern) level. The Stingray was prototyped passive, but went active for production. (The early 2 band EQ was also a little unconventional, as it was boost/cut on the treble, but pretty much boost only on the bass).
The L2000 had an early release that was passive with the L2000e as the active option. The L2000 eventually all came loaded active, but yes, the preamp could be bypassed with the switch. The M2000 is the always active variant with a more traditional, 3 band boost/cut EQ.