• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NBD-Mockingbird Heritage Classic

johnk_10

vintage bass nut
Inactive
Commercial User
Feb 16, 2008
21,240
23,633
Washington, Utah
johnkvintageguitars.homestead.com
Disclosures
John K Custom Basses
well, since i designed the stupid thing back in 1975 ;), i figured that i should at least own one of them again (so i bought two, a trans black and a trans red). i just picked the trans black one up locally for what i think was a reasonable price on craigslist. (BTW, i owned the first one ever made from january 1976 to 2001).

first impression:
this new Heritage Classic NJ has a quite a bit smaller, but quite a bit thicker body than the original prototype. even so, it is surprisingly much lighter than the original, weighing in at a reasonable 9lbs 5 oz. (the original was around 10.5-11lbs). it does still have a bit of a neck dive issue, but not as much as the original, and just like i did on the original, i relocated the strap button on the horn as outward as possible. fortunately, the way that i play this bass, my right forearm always rested comfortably on top of the lower bout on these basses, so i don't need to support the neck with my left hand.

the original had a solid maple body and neck (thru) with two rosewood stringers, with an unbound ebony fingerboard and double diamond shaped inlays, but i actually like the look of this one's bound neck with cloud inlays better. the prototype also had two Hi-A (bartolini) pickups and a bridge that was the predecessor to the badass, only it was much more massive and was machined from a block of solid brass and chrome plated. i've noticed that the new red ones have all black hardware, but i've never gone for that look, so i'm glad that the trans black ones have chrome tuners, knobs and bridges, and the trans red one that i bought also has chrome hardware just like the original ( being that i'm a 'traditionalist').

i bought this one with the intention of replacing both of the split p bass pickups and possibly ditching the preamp, but after plugging it in and hearing it, i now have no desire to do it. IMO, the pickups and preamp sound great.

it had a little front bow, so after adjusting the neck and slightly lowering the nut, it is now playing great with low action.

so, overall, i'm actually pretty darn impressed with it, especially for the price. while i was only 23 when i designed it, and my tastes of what a bass should look like may have changed back to preferring a fender or a ric, i still like the way that these look, even if it would look a bit funny if i used it in my current 'classic rock' band. it's kinda like visiting with an old friend. ;)

anyway, sorry for the long post, but as a consolation, here's a pic of it:

mockingbird-01.jpg
 
I love those basses!

You designed it? Did you get it free?
Very cool cool cool cool bass!

thanks. yes, i designed it, and our agreement was that Bernie was only supposed to make ONE of them. just mine, and no more, so i paid him $500 to build it in 1976 (they retailed for $1000 back then). i guess that we all know how that turned out. :rolleyes:
 
Looks great in that finish combination, congratulations on your new bass too. And a big Thank You for designing such a cool bass, I've owned one in the past - looks like I will again!
 
nope. i just designed the mockingbird. at first it was called the 'go-go' model because i used to go by the name johnny go-go (way back then). then Neal Moser renamed it the 'mockingbird' since it had splitter & phase switches, a varitone and a preamp boost circuit- he said it could 'mock' just about any bass, hence the MOCKingbird (Bernie gave all of his guitars bird names). first came the 'seagull', then the 'mockingbird', (which led to) the 'eagle' and as a departure from having bird names, 'the rich bitch'.

i think that Neal had a big part of the eagle design and i know for a fact that he designed the bitch.
 
to get this one to play even better, i just leveled the frets, recrowned and polished them. the action is like butter now. the saddles are now bottomed out, but get the saddles/action even a little lower on the G and E, i machined a little material off off of the bottom of them. now it plays like a dream with no buzzing.

just need to strobe it on my peterson V-SAM and wait for some hipshot ultralite tuners to arrive next week, which will take 2 1/4oz off of the headstock, further reducing the balance issues.

since i don't reallylike the red one's red headstock, i'm going to install a new rosewood face on it and inlay a bc rich 'R' like the original had. and i'm going to put some hipshot ultralites on it too, but the red one won't be here until next week.


as far as the preamp goes, i'm a passive guy too, but i really like the preamp in this bass. plus it has center detents so you can easily make it 'flat'.

if i were to go passive in it, i'd have seymour make me a calibrated set of vintage p bass pickups, with the bridge one having a slightly hotter (and slightly darker) wind, but like i said, i have no complaints with the stock electronics at all.

as it is, it has a volume, a blend, and treble & bass controls, and the blend control in this bass is the best (and only) blend control that i've decided to keep/use. its working so well may have something to do with it being active and not loading down the pickups when you're using it.
 
Well John, I owe you a big "thank you." I gigged a BC Rich Mockingbird from 1978 to 1981. It was a unique looking bass that had many, many great tones. Always thought Bernie Rico was inspired. Now I know the truth! Here's an old photo I scanned in. Soundcheck circa 1978. I think we opened for Y&T at this show. Anyway, thanks for the memories!

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=168297&d=1274542976
 
Nice bass. I owned one in cherry for awhile and a mockingbird guitar for awhile before that to. Just could never get comfortable with fit to body since I like to be able to rest rear of body against inside of leg. And their rear curve just made it want to slide oddly making me want to push it forward away from me. Nice shape visually but just didnt work well for me fit wise.
 
Well John, I owe you a big "thank you." I gigged a BC Rich Mockingbird from 1978 to 1981. It was a unique looking bass that had many, many great tones. Always thought Bernie Rico was inspired. Now I know the truth! Here's an old photo I scanned in. Soundcheck circa 1978. I think we opened for Y&T at this show. Anyway, thanks for the memories!

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=168297&d=1274542976

cool pic. i dig the musicman amp and the peavey PA column. and thank you for the memories. that's quite the nostalgic pic. ;)
 
must have been wild to see joe perry with a mockingbird back then, eh? funny, i always thought it was called a mockingbird because what else would you call it? looks like some sort of bird ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnk_10

Latest posts