Here's an interesting ESPN poll. Who should be the highest paid coach in the country?
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/fp/flashPollResultsState?sportIndex=ncf&pollId=82892
The results of indivual states is what is interesting to me.
Obviously, Texas for Brown, Bama for Saban, Flawda for Urban, Cali for Carrol, etc.
But more than that, the geography surrounding each state.
The SEC and ACC is pretty heavily for Saban, outside of Florida.
Only Texas thinks Brown should be it.
Much of the Pac-10 gives the nod to Pete, but by a slim margin considering he's a coach in that region.
The area surrounding Utah goes to Meyer, presumably because of his tenure at Florida versus the Utah defeat of Saban last year.
Much of the Big-10 area goes to Meyer, perhaps because of the OSU defeat at his hands.
Nobody gives Stoops the nod except Oklahoma, probably because he hasn't won a big game outside of his conference in years.
National vote is for Saban, which is no big surprise coming off a big win over Meyer. I'm sure last year's poll favored Meyer.
The Northeast is split between Meyer and Saban, except for Rhode Island which is in Carrol's favor.
Rhode Island is the perplexing state for me. I haven't looked up why that would be, and it's not coming to me off hand. Why would Rhode Island seem to poll in favor of Pete all the way on the West Coast? It doesn't make any sense to me. There has to be a connection I've forgotten, right?