• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NDB: Alembic Stanley Clark

The first time I saw Mr. Clark in concert was in Ann Arbor, MI, 1976, with Return to Forever. I thought I was a good bassist until I saw him....sheesh. I can't remember what bass he was playing at that gig, but it probably wouldn't mattered if he was playing a K-Mart Teisco Del Ray, he was that good. Beautiful bass, moon-bass!
 
  • Like
Reactions: moon-bass
I'm still not sold on the short scale - it plays and sounds great, but it's pretty different than my Jazz basses :)

Obligatory pics of course!

Had one until it was stolen about thirty years ago and I’m still broken hearted. Nearly bought one last year but I couldn’t justify the expense. Loved the tone and the look but playing one last year reminded me that it’s not just short scale, it’s skinny scale too! That neck is really thin! Still miss it though. Congratulations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moon-bass
Beautiful bass, but that long reach to the lowest frets, even on a shorter scale, would make my shoulder sore! Is that 30 or 32"?

These are typically 30"(as are Mr. Clarke's), with the occasional 32. Alembic refuses to make them in 34" as with those cutaways, they'd be hopelessly neck heavy.

As a side note, Alembic offers an SC5. Stanley wanted to try a 5 with a C a few years ago, do it's now another choice they offer in this body style.

The tone is brutally clear and as far as the build, they're heirloom instruments, they are BUILT to last a long, long time.

Congratulations, an icon instrument.
 
Last edited:
Congrats! I lusted for a decade and took the plunge on one last year. It’s nice to play — it just messes me up switching between it and other basses, as it’s a weird 30.75” — the neck feels as long as a football field. So, when I jump on it after playing another shorty — or a 34” (especially my 5-string 34”) — I have to adjust my brain to recognize the B on the D string is not an A, etc. I won’t even pick it up the week I have a gig on another bass to keep my head on straight.

The electronics allow it to sound like you own a ton of basses, and not just a one-trick pony. Congrats!
 
Last edited:
Congratulations! that is a beautiful bass. Wishing you many years of enjoyable playing.

I love these basses, I've owned one for around 30 years now, still going strong, still sounds awesome, still love playing it.

IMG_0026.JPG
 
Congratulations! that is a beautiful bass. Wishing you many years of enjoyable playing.

I love these basses, I've owned one for around 30 years now, still going strong, still sounds awesome, still love playing it.

View attachment 4992851
Beautiful!! Did those knobs come stock? I am thinking those would look great on my new bass :-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samatza
The separate tailpiece pushes the bridge, and the fretboard, away from the body, so it's effectively, and ergonomically, a medium-scale bass. And it requires medium-scale strings.
Yeah so about that ... It's got flats on it now, and I'm going to put rounds on it. Any suggestions on strings that work well? I prefer pure nickel rounds (not nickel plated) if that helps.
 
Yeah so about that ... It's got flats on it now, and I'm going to put rounds on it. Any suggestions on strings that work well? I prefer pure nickel rounds (not nickel plated) if that helps.

The stock Alembic CX-3/45S strings are actually not bad at all, and are somewhat smoother in feel than normal rounds. I've also managed to fit TI JR324 Jazz Rounds on one of my two Alembic (non-Stanley) short scales. Beyond those (and those are the extent of my direct experience), any medium-scale strings with a winding length between roughly 33" and 35" could conceivably work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moon-bass