I never thought the gap was enough to matter. Still don't. My advice: play it and let the wear be real, and your own...not manufactured.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I never thought the gap was enough to matter. Still don't. My advice: play it and let the wear be real, and your own...not manufactured.

The top is just that, a top. A veneer.
If there is a gap it would still be visable once the neck is removed, if a top covered it the effect would be much like the old Fender trick of covering it with a pickguard. I'm betting KK did not bother to do this, if there was a gap before the top, odds are there is a gap after the top. Not saying it couldn't be hidden like that, just that I don't see KK bothering for Jaco, considering how he had treated the bass. KK literally brought the BOD back from the dead, which was a big enough feat. Also consider the current attitude from his shop towards the gap, which again hints that he wouldn't bother trying to cover one if it existed.
I personally wouldn't care if the BOD had one or not, I would fix it, in BG's shoes. BG has said before, it is a "tribute" and not a "replica".
I was basically trying to improve on the belt-sanded Fender CS version of Jaco's bass.

I just thought of something...Wouldn't it be ironic if it was found that Jaco used a belt sander on his bass?![]()
I really appreciate the input, and I understand your opinion. I don't want to get into a philosiphical debate on relicing versus natural wear.