The principle of the idea - android is a mobile OS, and tablets aren't mobile as much as the manufacturers want them to be. Just because Apple can be lazy and slap iOs on everything like its the same item, but google should show some brains and use chrome OS as its meant to be used, in laptops (which, as much as some would disagree, a tablet is). A phone calls people, a laptop doesn't.
The iPad version of iOS 4 isn't the same as the iPhone version. They're each optimised for their form factor, and the apps reflect this. For instance, the iPad has several additional user interface elements that can be used over and above those available on the iPhone, such as contextual menus, default sidebars, etc.
Chrome OS and Android are two different beasts. Android is designed for touchscreen devices, allows installable apps and is tailored to mobile computing solutions. Chrome OS is designed to be used on a more traditional laptop form factor, with a keyboard and trackpad, and has no facility to install apps - everything happens through a version of Google's own Chrome browser, hence the name, and all "apps" and information are stored in the cloud. It's basically a modern interpretation of the old-skool "dumb terminal" or "thin client".
I'm all for Android-driven tablets, since Android was designed with touchscreens in mind. I love my iPad, but competition is good. What I don't get is why anyone is offering tablets that run Windows? Windows isn't designed for touchscreen use, it's still a traditional mouse-and-keyboard OS and more or less all Windows apps are designed with this in mind too. Where iOS and Android have the advantage is that neither one were designed to be used with a mouse or keyboard, so they could start with a clean slate.


Hopefully they'll be uninstallable.