• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New bass not as pictured on site

View attachment 4340265

Here is a picture. The picture online was a stock picture so not of the actual bass itself. I'll post some more pictures when I have a little more time
I don't get too caught up in cosmetics, but yeah that would bother me. I generally like pearl inlay, but on that finish, it looks really wimpy. I think what bugs me the more is the color of the neck wood. If it was the same as the bass, it may not look as bad. Some sort of colored (red or green etc) pearloid pick guard might tie things together better.

The fact that it plays great would be a tripping point for me. Do I risk getting a sub par player for a little cosmetic blip? The 40% discount you got may be worth living with it. It's not something you can really see while playing, so the only time it is really a concern is in pictures or when you're admiring your queen from afar. The fact that you're asking indicates that it doesn't bother you so much that you hate it.

I'm not familiar with your vendor, so I have no idea how responsive they will be to working with you over such a deeply discounted item. But, I would probably try to work with the vendor a little here. To me - so long as return windows remain open, I'd even see if I could by another bass (or even the right neck) for the same price with the proper neck and then return the one you don't want. That way, you don't really risk losing a great player. Of course this is less viable if you don't have and extra 1000 that you can float about for a few weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattZilla
Assuming that is in fact a Lakland neck whether intended for that bass or some model that fits (which I assume it would be, but couldn't be "sure" about it), I would be stoked and inclined to keep it. I would likely investigate by contacting the seller and Lakland just for some verification. It looks really good with the pearl blocks to me. I see the mismatch in wood color that was mentioned, but we are talking Ash/Maple (diff. woods) anyhow. I don't know if/where you would find another like it...

If the neck was somehow a reproduction, or the wood combination really bothers you, then I would look to return it.

Edit: I should have looked above at fauxtoe's post (nice find.) Looks like it's legit but I would still personally check with Lakland.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pcake
This has been the main reason why I won't buy basses from Bax shop; they almost always use stock factory pictures which is kinda useless to me, especially when ordering an instrument with visible wood grain and stuff like that. Buying amps and pedals is fine, used their shop regularly for that.
Also, and this is not to bash Bax in any way but it is true: the heavily discounted basses are typically b-stocks or blemished instruments. Nothing wrong with that, they can be fine instruments, and you can get some decent deals there; but it's something to keep in mind.
 
It feels great. Much better then the Ibanez 5er I have (SR1605 I believe). It's also not really that heavy.
0000_1.jpg


another "what if i got ripped off" case = resolved! ;) congratulations on your new instrument, OP! :thumbsup:


next!
 
The bass in the ad pic was probably returned 3 times because it's a dud. They discounted the hell out of it to get rid of it. Some knucklehead sent you the wrong bass that is a great bass (as you have found). Leave sleeping dogs lie.

That's my theory anyways. If it is a great bass keep it. FWIW I don't like pearl blocks but I would keep it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dudaronamous

Latest posts