BurningSkies
CRAZY BALDHEAD
- Feb 20, 2005
- 27,956
- 20,348
- Disclosures
- Endorsing artist: Dingwall Guitars
The buffer was a tone suck?
Are buffers not supposed to prevent exactly that?
Generally yes...but not all buffers are created equal,
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The buffer was a tone suck?
Are buffers not supposed to prevent exactly that?
I guess there are some good ones, some really good ones and some 'interesting' ones?Generally yes...but not all buffers are created equal,
I guess there are some good ones, some really good ones and some 'interesting' ones?
Do you know of a pedal that has high quality turn-off-able buffer that 'doesn't sound'?The one on the OC-2 ends up making stuff sound flat and lifeless to me. But then it was also a pedal and circuit designed long long ago. I don't thing the onboard buffers on the ES-5 sound bad and again, I like the one on the Cali, and the one on my Strymon Timeline.
Don't have the pedal experience to speak to the quality of the buffer. But the TC Sub n Up has the option to turn the buffer on or off to suit your cable lengths.Do you know of a pedal that has high quality turn-off-able buffer that 'doesn't sound'?
A buffer should just be a clean 1:1 amp that gives very high in and very low out impedance. No?
If my assumption is correct, one should not hear a difference apart from a really 'healthy' signal on the out end of a buffer. Right?
That is what I asked. Thanks!Don't have the pedal experience to speak to the quality of the buffer. But the TC Sub n Up has the option to turn the buffer on or off to suit your cable lengths.
Not even 100% sure that's what you asked. But grammatically it could be read as such.
Yeah the bypass/buffer tone is the main issue I’ve had with a number of otherwise really great Boss pedals. The most irritating Boss buffer issue for me was with their looper pedals, which I found tone-sucked my dry signal terribly compared to my Boomerang looper I had at the same time. It has kept me from trying out any modern Boss pedals for ages.Generally yes...but not all buffers are created equal,
Producer guy: So, you have a pedal demo for me?I wish I had been in the pitch meeting for that first video.
I thought the same for a very long time, but in the last few years I've come to appreciate a good octave down sound to really fill out and synth up some stuff. Currently have an OC3 which I like a lot, and my favorite analog ones have been the COGs and the Octron2 for the analog down and up. I like the 8-stringish digital octave-up sound, too, but sometimes it's just too "pingy". If someone could mod the new OC5 to have the upper octave on a footswitch that'd be aces.Too be honest I never saw the point of an octave down for bass. Octave up? Now that’s a good idea. If it tracks well that is.
4 is a very unlucky # in Japanese culture...Where’s the OC-4??
So at Boss they go 2, 3....5
I don't have a bass fretless eight strings ( each string doubled to an octave), and I'm looking for an octave up pedal that sounds as natural as possible...like a fretless eight strings ( each string doubled to an octave).Yeah,I don’t think i would use the up octave feature at all.
I have an 8-string bass for that.![]()
I don't have a bass fretless eight strings ( each string doubled to an octave), and I'm looking for an octave up pedal that sounds as natural as possible...like a fretless eight strings ( each string doubled to an octave).Agreed, sub-only octave on a fretless is killer - big part of what I do. I personally can't work with octave-up. The digital ones like the SubnUp sound like some weird sort of organ or keyboard. I like the analog octave up on my COG T-65, but it's not really usable on its own, more like an added tone to put on top of the sub-octave.