TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Correct, but it seems he had design input on all 4. I think he’s involved with at least 2 active bands, so it may be that he plays different basses depending on the context. Or maybe all 4 with both bands. I don’t know.OK, is it? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but isn't it four distinct basses?
OK, is it? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but isn't it four distinct basses?
OK, is it? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but isn't it four distinct basses?
Ugh. I’m almost sold on buying one of these. Only thing killing it for me is I want the passive full scale aesthetics of the natural with black hardware but with active electronics (much like Tim C. has in the below interview). Almost but no cigar….
The only thing I do wish the short scale active had was black hardware, that really would have checked all the boxes for me, but that's just me being picky.
No pickguard would even be better. Similar to the one in the Bullet in the Head video, for example.
Yes, you're right. The black pickguard looks good, too.although the ramp would look a bit conspicuous, then.
No other StingRays have that new ramp.
No previous StingRay Special has had the mute bridge, string-through body, or metal battery cover.
There's never previously been an active short-scale available.
Tim was directly involved in their development.
How does that not fit your criteria?

It just occurred to me. How amazing would these have been with an active/passive switch and the only difference between the 4 models been one of scale length and aesthetics?
That would be cool. They'd probably have to put in a 3-way switch to get the different coil tap options that the passive version has but that would be a cool feature as well for the active setting.