TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My biggest fear with this wave of ultra-light cab popularity is that it's so difficult to reproduce big, gut-rumbling low end from such a tiny box.
I've always been a believer that the bigger, heavy-duty cabs could go lower than their ultra-light weight competitors.
I mean, the larger the box, the better the bass response, correct?
CL400Peavey said:My 1515/66 is smaller, lighter, and louder than any 810 cab. It for a lower. The design just plain kicks the cap out of an 810.
i think you should be able to make a composite dually in the 40lb range. my scratchbuilt (dually-sized dual 15PR400) cab weighs 46 1/2lbs and it's made of 1/2" plywood. and BTW, it sounds great.
![]()
Is it ironic that I would play one of these <40 lbs 215s with an 85 lbs SVT-VR on top?
Is it ironic that I would play one of these <40 lbs 215s with an 85 lbs SVT-VR on top?
I recall that SWR used the "Bassic" name for it's Bassic Black combo introduced in 1992, then changed it to "Basic Black" the next year. I vaguely remember that the name change was due to a trademark conflict, but haven't tried to research it. Could that be an issue for this new cab? In any case, good luck with this great product.![]()