• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New marcus miller strings

#81
I agree xan but the Dunlop marcus string will have its fan base (no pun intended). I like them and can't say they are bad. They do have nice highs. And somewhat articulate, but not a favorite. But they will become favorites to some. I was a little disappointed but they are priced well at 20 dollars for a 5 string set.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obese Chess
#84
I see I was on an earlier thread asking about longevity of these strings. No responses on that so I'll find out soon enough as I've ordered two 4-string sets. Gun shy to replace the Fat Beams on my 5er (especially since I still have one 'in stock').
I've used Lo-Riders on two of my basses and really like them but I'll give these a go. I'm hoping Dunlop will redeem themselves after my previous experience.
 
#85
Limeman said:
Conclusion: Ok.. so before you assume I don't like these new Dunlop strings, I do think they are a pretty solid string. If you employ slap/pop technique a lot in your performance, then you will LOVE these strings. When used this way, they speak exceptionally well. Truly fantastic. If you have never played Fat-Beams, you will enjoy these strings. If you want to save money over DRs, you will either "love" these strings, or "learn" to love them. If you use a mix of techniques in your performance - favoring fingers/pick over thumb - they may not be your cup of tea. And again, the lack of low-end compared to FBs was a head turner for me. Bottom line: The Dunlop MMs are a very high-quality quality string that may very well work perfectly for you. I can highly suggest you take a swing at a pack and decide for yourself - especially if you use your thumb a lot. For me, however, I'm sticking with Fat-Beams and Hi-beams.

Now... I have to try out that set of Super Bright nickels and see if they can replace my much-loved Slinkys on a Stingray.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You've given me the answer I came looking for. I realized DR was discontinuing the MM-45's, my all time favorite strings (right after I used my last pack.. mind you), when I bought one of the Marcus Miller Sire basses. Man, was I sad. Now thanks to you guys I've learnt they're pretty much the same thing as the Fat Beams, and I'm shaging relieved they are. They give me the sound I've always aimed to have, so I'll be trying out the regular Fat Beams next time for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helix and PeaveyPlayer
#86
Awake DT said:
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You've given me the answer I came looking for. I realized DR was discontinuing the MM-45's, my all time favorite strings (right after I used my last pack.. mind you), when I bought one of the Marcus Miller Sire basses. Man, was I sad. Now thanks to you guys I've learnt they're pretty much the same thing as the Fat Beams, and I'm ****ing relieved they are. They give me the sound I've always aimed to have, so I'll be trying out the regular Fat Beams next time for sure.
Click to expand...

MM-45 are not discontinued. They just do not have the Marcus Miller name attached and are called only "Fat-Beams" and are part number FB-45
 
#91
I've been using the DR Fat Beams (45-105) since MM went to Dunlop. I have to say, I really don't think they are as good as the MM versions that preceded them. Particularly in terms of quality. They are very hit and miss for me in terms of how long they last. Maybe the quality control isn't as good?? The last batch I got seems to be especially bad. Maybe there are bad batches or it's in the (climate) condition the strings are kept in?? I dunno. I didn't really care all that much for the Dunlops. Might have to start looking again. Maybe Blue Steels. I don't think I believe all the marketing hype about them but at least they come wrapped up.
 
#92
Scot said:
I've been using the DR Fat Beams (45-105) since MM went to Dunlop. I have to say, I really don't think they are as good as the MM versions that preceded them. Particularly in terms of quality. They are very hit and miss for me in terms of how long they last. Maybe the quality control isn't as good?? The last batch I got seems to be especially bad. Maybe there are bad batches or it's in the (climate) condition the strings are kept in?? I dunno. I didn't really care all that much for the Dunlops. Might have to start looking again. Maybe Blue Steels. I don't think I believe all the marketing hype about them but at least they come wrapped up.
Click to expand...
FA beams are still the same. So, if you liked them, you don't have to stop.

I ordered a 4 string set of the dunlops, to try on my Fender Jaguar with Lollar thunderbird pickups. It only wears steels, so I will have plenty to say.
 
#94
Ant,
Not sure if this helps - Marcus Miller used to be with DR creating/endorsing Fat Beams. Based on an earlier posting from a Dunlop rep in this thread, he worked with Dunlop using their Super Brights as the 'base' of his newest signature string. So there is the regular Super Brights (a lot fans for this string, even on this thread!) and there is the Marcus Miller Dunlop Super Brights. I hope that helps!
I am a huge fan of the MM Super Brights, especially for the Rickenbacker. Great, aggressive string. I have been using this string for my active 5-string but would give the edge to Fat Beams for a more refined sound to the string. Once I burn through my 5string inventory of MM Super Brights, I will be returning to the Fats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrentSimons
#95
eriky4003 said:
Ant,
Not sure if this helps - Marcus Miller used to be with DR creating/endorsing Fat Beams. Based on an earlier posting from a Dunlop rep in this thread, he worked with Dunlop using their Super Brights as the 'base' of his newest signature string. So there is the regular Super Brights (a lot fans for this string, even on this thread!) and there is the Marcus Miller Dunlop Super Brights. I hope that helps!
I am a huge fan of the MM Super Brights, especially for the Rickenbacker. Great, aggressive string. I have been using this string for my active 5-string but would give the edge to Fat Beams for a more refined sound to the string. Once I burn through my 5string inventory of MM Super Brights, I will be returning to the Fats.
Click to expand...
What do you prefer about the fat beams compared to the Dunlop MM
 
#96
I'd say the DR Fat Beams have similar qualities as the Dunlop MM but are more refined whereas the Dunlop MM are more aggressive or in-your-face. Both have more booty in their lows than their 'lighter' counterparts (DR Hi-Beams & regular Dunlop Super Brights). You can check LimeMan's review dated May 10, 2015 on this thread and I'd say we share similar views. Saying that, the Rick will keep rockin' Dunlop MMs for the foreseeable future but my 5 string bass will see a return of Fat Beams once I've used up my Dunlop MM stock (1 more set).
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back