Now I'm a huge Stingray fan, in fact I only play Stingrays and Precisions nowadays, but what exactly is immensely better? I'd say the weight loss is by far the best thing they did on the Specials. The hollow saddles that they use (same as on the Classic line) are objectively worse because they don't allow the action to go as low as their standard saddles did. Might not be a problem for some though. So that's not better certainly.
Roasted necks? Cool. Looks pretty. Oil and wax finish is still the same, and it's a "wipe on wipe off" approach as it has always been. I've put 8 coats of Tru Oil on mine to give it a "gun stock" finish as it was intended to be used (Tru Oil is a varnish).
In terms of preamp/pickup/tone, I believe I'd prefer it to the old 3 band, but the 2 band has pretty much been the king for most Stingray aficionados - no high pass filter, fatter, more open tone, gets both smoother tones better and more aggressive ones no problem.
So.. Less weight? Yup. Contours? Never had a problem, even with a slab body rays and old SUBs. 22nd fret? I'd take it or leave it. Tone? That's subjective.
I'm not knocking the new ones, but Stingrays have always been great. Their quality was always high. There's nothing that would make them "immensely better".[/QUOTE
Total package IMO. EBMM shaved off edges on the right spots, and shifting to a 5 bolt neck/body joint doesn't cause a trainwreck when shifting up the neck. Tried a 2-band years ago, just wasn't my thing, all of my Srs are 3-band, ('14 4HH and '17 5H) just personal preference. 18V is great as well.
IMO, it's even better when hitched to a GK head/combo.
I'm not going back to edit, but it should of said, "...immensely better than the Fender..." Thx.