734/5 have alder/maple sandwich body.
434/5 is solid alder
BB Series - Specs - Yamaha - United States
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
New Yamaha BB series
- Thread starter hypercarrots
- Start date
434/5 is solid alder
BB Series - Specs - Yamaha - United States
Thanks all. Yeah seeing side by side helped. I wonder if the vsp7n is better than bsp5n? Maple in body on 734 seems interesting and has brass saddles on bridge.
I don't own one of these, but I do really appreciate the detailed pictures and information.
If I may suggest, I do think the B saddle is a way to improve the tone of the B string. That sharp angle moves the witness point back a little, so the saddle sits a little further forward than it would otherwise. This, along with the angled string-through-body feature, reduces the break angle of the string quite a bit. IME, when a B string has a really sharp break angle due to traditional string-through design, once the bend causes the winding to separate, even a new B string can sound dead and lifeless compared to the other strings. I avoid stringing the B through the body (if I have a choice) for this very reason. To my eye, Yamaha may have solved this problem with a couple fairly simple improvements.
While I love the look and feel of my new 734A, something about the tone is making me scratch my head:
Strange "piano" sound: is this a feature or a bug?
I love the BB series. However, I didn't like this new series at all.
YMMV, but, IMHO, the design of the BB 414/424 series* is so much better than this...
*I'm a proud owner of a BB 424 bass.
YMMV, but, IMHO, the design of the BB 414/424 series* is so much better than this...
*I'm a proud owner of a BB 424 bass.
I'm the proud owner of a BB425 and I have to disagree. The BB435 is at least as good and in some ways definitely better!
Question: does anyone know what the frequency center points are on the 734A pre-amp bass, mid and treble controls?
A final addition of a P35 today to the Krow Yammy herd:
For sure, I would be very happy to. The key difference between the two is undoubtedly the EQ with the BB 735A having Yamaha's 3 band EQ and active / passive selector switch, whereas the P35 is purely passive.
I was out gigging with my BB1025 last night (top white in picture) and the P35 appears to me to be very much the 'spiritual successor' to the 1025. The BB1025 is, btw, a bass I rate very highly and one that holds its own with other basses I've played which cost several times the price (including Fender, Warwick and Sandberg).
Unlike the 735A, the P35 also has a couple of the key ingredients of the former 'flagship' passive BB the BB2025 thrown in. It has one of the two wood treatment that the 2025 benefited from: the Initial Response Acceleration ('I.R.A') to give it a day one 'played in' feel plus it is a MIJ crafted bass, which I suspect accounts for a chunk of its premium pricing.
I'm going to live with the P35 for a little while and gig it a couple of times before reporting back more fully - but I hope that's a useful summary.
Last edited:
One other little difference (that initially had me confused!) was that the EQ on the 735A follows a lot of 3 band EQs layout with volume dial, pup selector / blend dial, and then 3 band EQ in active mode and treble / tone roll-off only in passive mode.
Invalid Link Removed
So 'muscle memory' kicks in when I first pick up the P35 today and I'm expecting the same i.e, vol dial, pup blend dial, and tone dial on the P35.
But, as those of you that already have them will know, that's not the case with the new BB "3 series" passive basses: instead there is a separate volume control for each pup and you blend accordingly.
Invalid Link Removed
Will just need to make sure I remember which is which and that they are not the same when I take them out gigging!
Invalid Link Removed
So 'muscle memory' kicks in when I first pick up the P35 today and I'm expecting the same i.e, vol dial, pup blend dial, and tone dial on the P35.
But, as those of you that already have them will know, that's not the case with the new BB "3 series" passive basses: instead there is a separate volume control for each pup and you blend accordingly.
Invalid Link Removed
Will just need to make sure I remember which is which and that they are not the same when I take them out gigging!
thats what i like about my BB1200s and BB1200Ss. only one pickup...One other little difference (that initially had me confused!) was that the EQ on the 735A follows a lot of 3 band EQs layout with volume dial, pup selector / blend dial, and then 3 band EQ in active mode and treble / tone roll-off only in passive mode.
Invalid Link Removed
So 'muscle memory' kicks in when I first pick up the P35 today and I'm expecting the same i.e, vol dial, pup blend dial, and tone dial on the P35.
But, as those of you that already have them will know, that's not the case with the new BB "3 series" passive basses: instead there is a separate volume control for each pup and you blend accordingly.
Invalid Link Removed
Will just need to make sure I remember which is which and that they are not the same when I take them out gigging!
It would seem that this relatively unknown British bass player shares your taste in basses
Weights and balance
The P35 actually 'hangs' a little more comfortably off my frame than my other three Yammys. So when I put them all on the scales I was a little surprised to find:
P35 and NE2 - 10.2 lbs
735A and 1025 - 9.6 lbs
The combination of a slightly heavier body and lightweight tuners on the P35 gives it more of a balance between neck and body and, in consequence, there is a touch less neck dive on the P35.
Still getting used to having individual volume controls on the P35 - it's actually a really nice feature, but the flip side is that it's a bit less easy to switch pups than by using the selector switch on the 1025 or dialling a pup selector knob mid song, as you have to deal with two knobs rather than just one. Fortunately not something I'm needing to do too often!
The P35 actually 'hangs' a little more comfortably off my frame than my other three Yammys. So when I put them all on the scales I was a little surprised to find:
P35 and NE2 - 10.2 lbs
735A and 1025 - 9.6 lbs
The combination of a slightly heavier body and lightweight tuners on the P35 gives it more of a balance between neck and body and, in consequence, there is a touch less neck dive on the P35.
Still getting used to having individual volume controls on the P35 - it's actually a really nice feature, but the flip side is that it's a bit less easy to switch pups than by using the selector switch on the 1025 or dialling a pup selector knob mid song, as you have to deal with two knobs rather than just one. Fortunately not something I'm needing to do too often!
Last edited:
Hello there, thanks for the all the nice information in this thread.
I am very much tempted to by a bb734 but I also hear a lot of good things about the Sire P7 (which is a bit cheaper but with comparable spects).
Has any of you had the opportunity to compare these ?
Thanks a lot
I am very much tempted to by a bb734 but I also hear a lot of good things about the Sire P7 (which is a bit cheaper but with comparable spects).
Has any of you had the opportunity to compare these ?
Thanks a lot
I tried a 735a out and then went and got a P7 5 string. Very nice bass and lovely neck, but the bridge pup was faulty so i had to send it back.
I really like Sire basses, had a V7 since they first came out, but not too keen on active basses, especially not P basses. I just dont think a P bass needs active electronics.
I really like Sire basses, had a V7 since they first came out, but not too keen on active basses, especially not P basses. I just dont think a P bass needs active electronics.
Yammy BBs & J pup
The J pup tends to be viewed as the poor cousin on Yammy BBs and rarely gets solo'd from what most folk have said. I'm 'with the crowd' on this and typically use the P or a blended PJ on my BBs when playing clean.
Was messing about with a couple of drive pedals today, and frankly the solo J with a drive pedal blows the P and PJ settings out the water in terms of delivering a meaty drive with great sustain.
Guessing this may already be familiar to BB Land - but it was a very pleasant surprise for me and yet another facet to the capabilities of the Yammy BB.
The J pup tends to be viewed as the poor cousin on Yammy BBs and rarely gets solo'd from what most folk have said. I'm 'with the crowd' on this and typically use the P or a blended PJ on my BBs when playing clean.
Was messing about with a couple of drive pedals today, and frankly the solo J with a drive pedal blows the P and PJ settings out the water in terms of delivering a meaty drive with great sustain.
Guessing this may already be familiar to BB Land - but it was a very pleasant surprise for me and yet another facet to the capabilities of the Yammy BB.
