• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NFL Week 11

Their offense gets better every week, though. They said it several times during the broadcast - Orton is looking more like a five year vet than a rookie. And he really is looking that good. His offensive line is doing a great job, and he's playing with a lot of confidence.

The running game is pretty solid. Seems like they either get stuffed for no yards or break out for 10, though. If their receivers can keep up with Orton (which, if that were the case this week, the score would have been more of a blowout), the offense will be solid enough to win big games.
 
SuperDuck said:
.... If their receivers can keep up with Orton (which, if that were the case this week, the score would have been more of a blowout), the offense will be solid enough to win big games.

Defintitely.....

- A dropped pass by Clark kept them from getting into the red-zone.

- Muhammad dropped a pass in the end zone

- Muhammad dropped a pass that would have been a long gainer when the Bears were at midfield.

The receivers cost the Bears at least 13 points.
 
cheezewiz said:
As much as it pains me to admit it Jive, the Bears D certainly apprears to be for real. How far can they go with next to no offense though?

Well look at history...

How about a team whose inexperienced QB passed for 2800 yards and 18 TDs, and had a retread RB? Answer - New England Patriots 2001 Superbowl champs. Tom Brady was a first year starter, and Antowain Smith, a castoff from the Bills was the RB.

Or how about a team whose QB only passed for 1500 yards, and 12TDs, and a rookie rusher that only had 6 TDs? Answer - Baltimore Ravens 2000 superbowl champs. Trent Dilfer was the QB, and it was Jamal Lewis' rookie year.

So considering the above teams, how much different are the Bears? Thomas Jones is on a pace to match what the RBs above did, and Orton has almost reached Dilfer's stats already.

Bears a Superbowl team? I have my doubts, but from what I've seen this season I do have my hopes too.
 
I was waiting for the Ravens comparison. It is indeed valid, but it certainly doesn't happen often, that a team like that goes far into the post season. I'm certainly admitting the Bores appear to be for real. If this turns out NOT to be the case, I'll of course celebrate all the dashed hopes of the Bores fans, but if it DOES turn out to be the case, there is at least consolation in the fact it ain't the purple porno pirates. ;)
 
jive1 said:
Bears a Superbowl team? I have my doubts, but from what I've seen this season I do have my hopes too.

LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.ROFLOL.

Now Jive, c'mon. One win by the fairies over a team with a winning record and you get all superbowly on us. I might be convinced in 3 or 4 games assuming fairies go on a 4-0 run. That pansy-ass 3rd or 4th place NFC North schedule is finally getting some teeth and you have to face Steelers, Bucs and Falcons and of course the mighty ironman Favre. One solid win does not a superbowl make.
 
mrpackerguy said:
LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.ROFLOL.

Now Jive, c'mon. One win by the fairies over a team with a winning record and you get all superbowly on us. I might be convinced in 3 or 4 games assuming fairies go on a 4-0 run. That pansy-ass 3rd or 4th place NFC North schedule is finally getting some teeth and you have to face Steelers, Bucs and Falcons and of course the mighty ironman Favre. One solid win does not a superbowl make.


Bah! Farve! Ironman! hahahahahahahahaha You sir are funny!
 
page said:
Bah! Farve! Ironman! hahahahahahahahaha You sir are funny!

Till this season that was true. Farve has looked UGLY thus far... about as ugly as Orton looked in his first few games. Now THAT is ugly. I must also say this year will be one of the first years in a LONG time that I'm actually looking forward to the Bears-Packers game because I can finally expect a win.
 
mrpackerguy said:
LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.ROFLOL.

Now Jive, c'mon. One win by the fairies over a team with a winning record and you get all superbowly on us. I might be convinced in 3 or 4 games assuming fairies go on a 4-0 run. That pansy-ass 3rd or 4th place NFC North schedule is finally getting some teeth and you have to face Steelers, Bucs and Falcons and of course the mighty ironman Favre. One solid win does not a superbowl make.

Does anyone talk about the Seahawks easy schedule and crap division? The media will talk about how they are Superbowl contenders. Who have those guys beaten? They lost to the two teams with a decent D - JAX and WAS. They beat ARZ and STL twice, beat HOU, and barely got past the 49ers. I wouldn't call that a world beater schedule. Yet, these guys are called an elite team? Please

How bout the Gints? Their only "good" win was against DEN. Other wins were against the hapless Cards, Aints, 9ers, and the wingless Eagles. But that doesn't stop the media and the mobs from calling them "elite" or "contenders". I wouldn't call the Cowpokes "elite" either, even though they have beaten better teams.

The dirty south? The Bucs have only beaten 1 team with a winning record. The Panthers only 2, and Atlanta none.

The NFC has no real dominant team, so Bears winning the NFC isn't out of the question. Nothing I've seen from the "favorites of experts" in the NFC makes them dominant. It's anyone's division. Anyone includes the Bears.

Yup I've been drinking the Kool-Aid, and it's quite good!
 
Hey Page: not my words.

From Seahawks.com: ..."preseasons in Green Bay, but never saw the light of the regular season with Favre, the superstar ironman, running the show." [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

From the Wikipedia definition of Ironman en.wikipedia.org: "The Iron Man phrase has also been used in other sports for players with long consecutive games played streaks, like Brett Favre." (Only thing missing is his picture by the definition of ironman)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Man_(disambiguation)

And finally - want Brett favre Wallpaper to adorn your computer? Here's what Tucows calls their Brett Favre download: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

So "Bah!" I say "bah!" to you, and "Bah" to "Bah'ing" one of your Mississippi's favorite sons!
 
jive1 said:
Does anyone talk about the Seahawks easy schedule and crap division? The media will talk about how they are Superbowl contenders. Who have those guys beaten? They lost to the two teams with a decent D - JAX and WAS. They beat ARZ and STL twice, beat HOU, and barely got past the 49ers. I wouldn't call that a world beater schedule. Yet, these guys are called an elite team? Please

How bout the Gints? Their only "good" win was against DEN. Other wins were against the hapless Cards, Aints, 9ers, and the wingless Eagles. But that doesn't stop the media and the mobs from calling them "elite" or "contenders". I wouldn't call the Cowpokes "elite" either, even though they have beaten better teams.

The dirty south? The Bucs have only beaten 1 team with a winning record. The Panthers only 2, and Atlanta none.

The NFC has no real dominant team, so Bears winning the NFC isn't out of the question. Nothing I've seen from the "favorites of experts" in the NFC makes them dominant. It's anyone's division. Anyone includes the Bears.

Yup I've been drinking the Kool-Aid, and it's quite good!

Jivey:

I'll give you this. I was listening to the end of the game and I heard Dick Stockton or who ever was calling the game say something to the effect of "And now the bears join the ranks of the elite in the NFL." Not that what Dick Stockton says is gospel because tomorrow he'll probably be calling a Russian discus throwing comptetiion in the Ukrane and saying the same thing about some guy named Uri Rasputinoff or some such thing.
 
jive1 said:
Anyway, I gotta give props to MrPackerGuy and Cheezewiz for still posting in these threads. Seems like all the other Packer Backers are MIA...


Sundogue
SuperBassMan2000
Vegaas
The Golden Boy

Where are you now?

Like you Jivey, there something to be said for true loyalists, through good and bad, thick n thin. I'm sure I speak for Cheese when I say "We love our Pack". And anyone who lived through the 70s and 80s and can still hang on rather than jump on. Nothing boring about our beloved black n blue division esepcially now that the bucs are gone.
 
mrpackerguy said:
Hey Page: not my words.

From Seahawks.com: ..."preseasons in Green Bay, but never saw the light of the regular season with Favre, the superstar ironman, running the show." [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

From the Wikipedia definition of Ironman en.wikipedia.org: "The Iron Man phrase has also been used in other sports for players with long consecutive games played streaks, like Brett Favre." (Only thing missing is his picture by the definition of ironman)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Man_(disambiguation)

And finally - want Brett favre Wallpaper to adorn your computer? Here's what Tucows calls their Brett Favre download: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

So "Bah!" I say "bah!" to you, and "Bah" to "Bah'ing" one of your Mississippi's favorite sons!


I still say Bah! to Favre, I'll take Jerry Rice as my native son thank you! :D
 
jive1 said:
Anyway, I gotta give props to MrPackerGuy and Cheezewiz for still posting in these threads. Seems like all the other Packer Backers are MIA...


Sundogue
SuperBassMan2000
Vegaas
The Golden Boy

Where are you now?
Not MIA - MIE (Missing in Enthusiasm).

It's tough watching a seasoned vet like Favre go out on a low note (team, not personal), especially with no hope for the near future. I just realized the other day that my almost-14-year-old son has known no other Packers' QB than Brett. In that time span, the Bears have been through about what? 30 or so?

It has been fun watching the resurgence of the Bears. I'm not the kind of Packers fan that wishes ill on division rivals (used to be - not anymore). If it can't be my Packers, then go Bears.

As long as it ain't the Purple Porn Peddlers from da Nort. ;)
 
Everybody always talks about who the Bears have played. What would they say if they lost to the teams they play. At the end of the season it is all about wins and losses. It doesn't matter how much you won by it is if you win or not. If you win every game this season by 20 or 1 you still end up 16-0. And for those who talk about the Bears O, you only need 17 points if your D is only giving up 11!!!!!! :D

I just want the Bears to beat the Pack at Soldier Field. Favre has owned us at home and I want to send him out on a good note.
 
seaKamp said:
Till this season that was true. Farve has looked UGLY thus far... about as ugly as Orton looked in his first few games. Now THAT is ugly. I must also say this year will be one of the first years in a LONG time that I'm actually looking forward to the Bears-Packers game because I can finally expect a win.

Boy, I don't know where you're coming from??/. First, after tonight, I expext he'll be back in the top 10 QBs in the league where he was last week. He really hasn't missed a beat. Up until 2 weeks ago he led the league in TD throws (and INTs to be fair) until Carson Palmer unseated him. He's on pace for another 4000 yd season. Check your stats and know your players before speaking untruths.

The other point is that "Ironman" doesn't refer to game performance, but rather ability to stay healthy and consecutive games started. I don't think there's any active player even close to his number of consecutive games Favre has started. The bears have started something like 16 QBs since Favre took over for the Pack? Maybe it's more.

I wouldn't automatically give the Bears a win. Our D has risen from pathetic to 10th in the league. Our O-line has been playing much better as a unit and will perform heads n shoulders above Carolina's. I don't think it's going to be the slam dunk you think.

I always said, on any given Sunday, any NFC Norris team can beat the other. I've seen it happen too many times in 35-odd years of watching Packer games.
 
Robear22 said:
Everybody always talks about who the Bears have played. What would they say if they lost to the teams they play. At the end of the season it is all about wins and losses. It doesn't matter how much you won by it is if you win or not. If you win every game this season by 20 or 1 you still end up 16-0. And for those who talk about the Bears O, you only need 17 points if your D is only giving up 11!!!!!! :D

I just want the Bears to beat the Pack at Soldier Field. Favre has owned us at home and I want to send him out on a good note.

Both the Lambeau and Spaceship games will be great games!