• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NHL 2013 post season thread!

Yes it is...the Habs are looking good again! Of course, we still need a goalie. But, Ottawa does not have a lot of depth offensively so I think we can take them.
Ottawa has a *LOT* of character guys. It'll be extremely draining for any team to play against them, hence why they managed to win so many games without the likes of Spezza, Michalek, and Karlsson for most of the season.
 
If you guys like to do the fantasy thing, feel free to share this with your friends. My favorite fantasy sport is playoff hockey box pool.

bb-2013-playofff-box-pool.png


Very straight forward. You pick a player from each box (box 1 has Ovi, box 2 has Kopitar). For every point your player gets (goal or assist = 1 point), you get 1 point.

It's easy because all you do is pick the players and that's it, don't have to manage starters or what not.
 
My predictions, for what they're worth ;

WEST ;

Chicago in 5 (VS Minnesota)
Anaheim in 5 (VS Detroit)
Vancouver in 4 (VS San Jose)
LA in 4 (VS St Louis)

EAST ;

Pittsburgh in 5 (VS the Islanders)
Montreal in 7 (VS Ottawa)
Washington in 6 (VS NYR)
Boston in 5 (VS Toronto)

I can explain the reasoning for each if anybody is curious enough to ask. However, predictions are always funny because almost nobody comes out of the Playoffs looking like a genius. There will be some upsets and the highest-ranked so-called hockey expert will be made to look like a fool in one way or another. lol!
 
If you guys like to do the fantasy thing, feel free to share this with your friends. My favorite fantasy sport is playoff hockey box pool.

bb-2013-playofff-box-pool.png


Very straight forward. You pick a player from each box (box 1 has Ovi, box 2 has Kopitar). For every point your player gets (goal or assist = 1 point), you get 1 point.

It's easy because all you do is pick the players and that's it, don't have to manage starters or what not.

We can do it here if others are willing, I'm down.
 
If you guys like to do the fantasy thing, feel free to share this with your friends. My favorite fantasy sport is playoff hockey box pool.
I'm game.

I won my hockey pool, this year. Came out of it with a bounty of about 350$. Pretty sweet. :) The way we play though is once a player is selected, he cannot be chosen by anybody else. We do a snake draft.

Anyway, we also do a Playoffs pool the same way, so it'll be interesting to see how I fare.

In the meantime, I'll let you guys know my choices.

Box 1 : Crosby (taking a chance)
Box 2 : Kane
Box 3 : Nash
Box 4 : Malkin
Box 5 : Datsyuk
Box 6 : Sedin
Box 7 : Kunitz
Box 8 : Carter
Box 9 : Neal
Box 10 : Krejci
Box 11 : Brad Richards
Box 12 : Saad
Box 13 : Zetterberg
Box 14 : Dupuis
Box 15 : Sharp
Box 16 : Letang
Box 17 : Keith
Box 18 : Green
 
Repost of my very humble predictions

I'm going chalk on the East and the B's will need the full 7 against the Leafs. I have no idea about the West.

The Pens are the class of the conference and should emerge on top. I'd like to see another B's-Canadians series somewhere along the way; just because it is spring and the B's always seem to play the CH'ers in the spring (or is it the HC's? I'm not trolling, I honestly don't know :confused:).
 
If seeding decided who wins series, they wouldn't play the games! :)

By the way, Letang tied PK Slewban for total points with 8 less games played, had 8 PIM and was a +16 on the season. If he doesn't win the Norris I'll be speechless.
The Norris isn't solely about stats.

The Maurice Richard, yes. The Norris, no.

It was awarded 7x in 8 years to Doug Harvey and 8 straight years to Bobby Orr.

Crazy!
 
Wasn't the team called "Club de Hockey Canadien" at some point, or is it still? I think I recall seeing an explanation of the logo (might be a past one) explaining that the two layers in the C were because there was two C in the name ("CHC").
 
I can see the Kings getting past St. Louis, but I'm not feeling very confident about them getting very far past that. Last year, they were playing fantastic hockey at the end of the reguar season and were able to carry the momentum. I'm not getting the same vibe from them this year. Quick has been decent, but not the same force he was last year.
 
Wasn't the team called "Club de Hockey Canadien" at some point, or is it still? I think I recall seeing an explanation of the logo (might be a past one) explaining that the two layers in the C were because there was two C in the name ("CHC").
From Wikipedia.

One of sport's oldest and most recognizable logos, the classic 'C' and 'H' of the Montreal Canadiens was first used together in the 1917–18 season, when the club changed its name to "Club de hockey Canadien" from Club athlétique Canadien, before evolving to its current form in 1952–53. The "H" stands for "hockey", not "Habs" or "Habitants", a popular misconception. According to NHL.com, the first man to refer to the team as "the Habs" was American Tex Rickard, owner of the Madison Square Garden, in 1924. Rickard apparently told a reporter that the "H" on the Canadiens' sweaters was for "Habitants."
 
Bryzgalov's parting words to the media ;

When asked if being blamed for the Flyers' struggles this year bothered him, this is what he had to say. From the Courier Post Online:

'Not anymore. Not anymore. You guys just here to blame someone. You never look yourselves in the mirror, eh? You’re always good. You never make the mistakes. Your articles are always perfect. In reality, what have you done for this city? If you ask yourself, what have you done besides only criticize? Not much.'

But sometimes the media do more than criticize. Sometimes they ask follow-up questions, and this certainly necessitated one. Next, Bryzgalov was asked if he felt the media coverage was unfair, and his response to this question is incredible:

'It’s not like fair or unfair. We already had the conversation. It’s just ridiculous. Just ridiculous. Sometimes you’re reading and it’s like, ‘Oh my God, who is this lunatic?’ What are they writing about. It was nothing close to the truth or close to related to hockey. You read this and you’re like, ‘Oh my God, I’ve got to deal with these people every day.’

Only until 2020.

More Bryz:

'I’ve said it before, guys. Before you’re writing something you’ve got to read what you’re writing. I’m two years here. I never saw it like good article with everything, like, ‘Flyers lose the game because this, this, this, this, this. They need to improve their game like this, this, this or this.’ I never. That’s what called professionalism. It’s like, ‘OK, this reporter knows hockey. He knows what he talking about.’
I personally agree with him.