• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Nitro or poly?

Nitro or Poly

  • Nitro

    Votes: 200 70.7%
  • Poly

    Votes: 92 32.5%

  • Total voters
    283
If you could have your choice between nitrocellulose or polyurethane on a Fender type bass at the same cost, what would you choose and why?
I guess it would depend on my objectives. First, I am fairly certain even the Nitro basses from Fender have a preliminary polyester or urethane seal precoat. I guess if I wanted something to relic I would pick Nitro. If I wanted something that would withstand dings and such I would get urethane. The idea that a bass will sound differently on a modern finished guitar is preposterous. The idea that because Nitro "breathes", made instruments from the 50's into some kind of magic machine is preposterous. Do you or anyone else think that the basses or strats or teles of that era sounded bad when they were first made, but only somehow gained magical status after they lost moisture over time, even if there wasn't such a thing as environmental equilibration? Nitro is neat, urethane is neat. For the most part the days of MiM instruments having gobs or urethane on them are over.

But if I was to get a Fender bass, it would be a 72-75 telecaster bass with a WR humbucker in either black or blonde Nitro, because I would want it to look old, fast.
 
If you could have your choice between nitrocellulose or polyurethane on a Fender type bass at the same cost, what would you choose and why?

I think most of the better finished basses aren't done in Polyurethane, but in a UV-catalyzed Polyester anyway.

And I think that nitrocellulose is a crap finish that has no place on new guitars that I buy. There's some traditionalist nonsense that dictates that "if it was good enough…" for some old rocker, then it's bitchin' for me, but I'm not a subscriber. Nitrocellulose cracks, checks, chalks, discolors, reacts with random chemicals and materials, etc., and that's just not a fashion statement I'm interested in.

Since I DO have a choice of finishes (and finished basses, for that matter), my wallet has been voting hard in the direction of polywhatever.
 
I don't have any polyurethane finish basses currently.
Precision Nitro finish white over CAR, with matching headstock;
JB 1, Nitro fiesta red with matching headstock;
JB 2, Nitro white body;
JB 3, white nitro with matching headstock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJan3
I had to vote "Poly".

My Jade P-Bass (see avatar), when polished-up, looks brand new, even after 6+ years of continuous use. And while I like the mojo of old instruments with their battle scarred nitro finishes, I'd rather have a durable finish on my new instruments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoePP
I like the way nitro feels and wears better than poly. That doesn't keep me from playing my Lull V4, which has a poly finish. But given the choice, I'll take nitro every time. As a caveat to all of that, when I ordered my Lull, they gave me the option of a nitro finish. The upcharge was $600 if I remember correctly. This was about 10 years ago. I didn't prefer nitro enough to want to pay another $600.