• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Nitro or poly?

Nitro or Poly

  • Nitro

    Votes: 200 70.7%
  • Poly

    Votes: 92 32.5%

  • Total voters
    283
I don't believe the Fender American Special I had was anything but hand rubbed stain with a layer of nitro over the top. It had a great feel to it, and if it didn't sound different, it definitely felt like it sounded different, and I liked it. My roadworn jazz felt almost as good, but I might believe there was some plastic on there somewhere. Poly is ok too, but just because of the durability, which I do appreciate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajkula66
Nitro, but only because every bass I've ever owned has been poly and I think basses that age over time in a tasteful way look great. Pretty silly reasons.

Not silly reasons. There is no right or wrong for what people like. Ice cream is scientifically better than potato chips, right? How would you even go about supporting such a thing? I think it's more silly for people to think you have to like the most durable finish. What if that's not the most important thing to me?
 
As a refinisher for over 20 years, I find nitro to wear and age poorly and honestly, it's become more or less obsolete. With all the new technology, even poly is becoming obsolete. I prefer acrylic urethanes and I'm looking forward to trying some of the new nano finishes.
 
I don't believe the Fender American Special I had was anything but hand rubbed stain with a layer of nitro over the top. It had a great feel to it, and if it didn't sound different, it definitely felt like it sounded different, and I liked it. My roadworn jazz felt almost as good, but I might believe there was some plastic on there somewhere. Poly is ok too, but just because of the durability, which I do appreciate.
Ah, did you have one of the limited edition honey burst ones?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220126-152155.png
    Screenshot_20220126-152155.png
    872.9 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KJMO
I'm a former finish guy for a boutique acoustic maker who worked with nothing but nitro the entire time and I didn't have to think about how I'd answer this: poly.

It sounds the same on electric instruments as nitro just so long as you do it thin (not the way most makers do, loading it up until it's a couple of millimeters thick when dry) and it's far less reactive with stands, case plush, bag interiors. It's also a lot more forgiving of impact.

There's a time and a place for everything, and the time and place for nitro is on acoustic instruments.

Also, FWIW, "nitro finished" Fender basses are a thin coat of nitro on top of a poly finish. Even the old Fenders were a few coats of nitro on top of a thick coating of Plasti-Dip. There's never been a Fender made that started with a nitro finish directly applied to grain-filled wood, save possibly for a few Custom Shop pieces.
I mentioned the Fender thing earlier, but I didn't think they started with the polyester coat until 1962 or something like that?
 
I'd vote no finish at all. I base that on the fact that I have probably owned about 25 different Stratocasters in my life. One of them had been sanded down and all finish removed. It is the only guitar I will ever rate as a 10 and it is the one guitar I compare all others to. Leaned up against a Marshall amp it would sustain beautifully and endlessly without ever getting out of control. I believe the bare wood was a real factor for its amazing tone. Still not going to remove the finish from my poly Precision.
 
They always used the undersealer. They started using poly lacquer in 62 I think.
That's what I thought. I've just always thought it funny that people used to get so uptight about "nitro breathing". I remember an interview on NPR with Redd Volkaert saying these old teles are great because they breathe and are light. Redd was it really not a great instrument in 1952? I bet it sounded identical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iristone