JeezyMcNuggles
Inactive
- Feb 23, 2018
- 14,723
- 20,970
- Disclosures
- I suck, but nobody really notices
There was one spot around the 7th fret on the g string on my SR605. That's the only one I've ever encountered. I've owned 5 basses. So, I guess the "...most unlucky..." could apply here. Sorry man.I currently own over 30 basses. Some are cheap entry level stuff or quirky vintage models but most of them are quite expensive, top-of-the-range or custom made instruments.
I must have owned more than 50 basses over the years.
Counting the basses I've played in stores or borrowed... I must have played HUNDREDS of basses.
EVERY SINGLE ONE of them had dead spots. Some were less noticable that others and the exact location on the neck could vary. But they ALL had dead spots. Bolt-on, neck through, set neck, graphite rods... they ALL have dead spots in my experience.
Looking at the physics behind dead spots I don't understand how it would even be possible to design a resonating wooden instrument such as the bass guitar without any deadspots. Even a device like the Fatfinger, which is designed to "tune out" deadspots, doesn't really remove them. The deadspots are simply moved to other notes.
Yet, hardly a week goes by without reading a NBD thread here on Talkbass where someone says their new bass has "no dead spots".
Which leaves me with these two options:
1) I'm the most unlucky guy ever when it comes to basses and dead spots (plus I must have gotten the science behind deadspots all wrong).
or
2) Lots of people don't really understand what dead spots are. I asked a friend who is a guitar player about this and he thought a dead spot was simply a bad fret. Is this a common misconception?
Anyway, I'm genuinely baffled by the number of claims about "no dead spots" around here, even on the cheapest entry level basses.
So which one is it, 1) or 2)?