TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
...
spontaneous, improvised art form, man". OK, I get that. But this is what bugs me: we finish a song, then we look at each other and start discussing how we all did.
"I started to play the Basie ending, but then I heard what you were doing, so I tried to follow that..."
"I thought you were going to play the high harmony note, so I played ..."
After a minute or two of this, the selection of the next tune starts.
"How about Straight No Chaser?"
"No, we just did a blues, how about a latin tune? Girl From Ipanema?"
"OK, yeah. (starts flipping through Real Book) Wait, how about Triste?"
"Triste, yeah. Is that in Book 1 or Book 2?" (more flipping through books)
Now five minutes have gone by and we're still not playing yet.,
If I'm ever a band leader, there will be a set list, all players will have it a week in advance, and all players will be expected to have their charts printed out, in order, at the start of the gig. Otherwise you are not getting your share of the $23 we made in tips. Wait, maybe that's the problem right there...
Master song lists I can see, but the crowd dictates what you should play next. . .
I agree Ben Wilkie.
As for cover bands, I don't understand why your set list would NOT be 99.99% dance tunes period. When I read guys saying " go with the crowd and if they want to dance" i am flummoxed. If you are playing a bar you should be playing things that make them dance and thirsty, so they drink more and dance more. Why would you play anything that isn't fun? You are not paid to entertain yourself, you are paid to entertain the crowd.
...
That's another fallacy that's related to "It's got to be spontaneous!" As a musician onstage, individual or as part of a unit, our job is to be the "leader" or facilitator of the party.
Several people have said "my regular band doesn't use a set list", and I think that's fine. You all know the material and can probably transition from one song to the next fairly quickly. To me, that's the key: keep the energy up, keep entertaining the audience.
...
Well, that was sort of my point - but trying to predict a crowd in advance? Listen, not saying set lists are bad - but when I play a place that is known for older classic rock crowd and a butt load of twenty something's come in looking to dance, no pre-gig set list in the world is going to lead them (to anywhere other than the door). Believe it or not, this sort of thing happens a lot to places I play (crowds being radically different from gig to gig). Just trying to say flexibility far supersedes the comfort of knowing what song is next.
Maybe I've been spoiled by the bands I've played in that do this - that have a leader who is usually on the mark. Kinda the same for song forms/endings too. I've grown quite fond of changing it up. The crowds always seem to be WAY more responsive to that too . . . flubs and all. ymmv
My band is very adept at going from one song to the next with no song list and many people compliment that fact that we do not spend time between songs, are very versatile with a variety of music with over 130 songs covering 6 decades, take requests (if we know them) and play them soon after they are requested. We usually don't have our opening song selected until we get up to start. Sometimes, we ease into the show depending on the venue and crowd and sometimes we come out rocking. I always believe though just because that formula works for us does not mean it works for other bands; especially if there is some type of show or banter built around the songs. It helps that we already know the songs and can just call something out and play it. I have played in many bands that I had to create a set list for every week and that worked for those bands.
Several people have said "my regular band doesn't use a set list", and I think that's fine. You all know the material and can probably transition from one song to the next fairly quickly. To me, that's the key: keep the energy up, keep entertaining the audience.
I do a lot of sub gigs with jazz bands, and it seems like no one ever wants to commit to a set list. "It's a spontaneous, improvised art form, man". OK, I get that. But this is what bugs me: we finish a song, then we look at each other and start discussing how we all did.
"I started to play the Basie ending, but then I heard what you were doing, so I tried to follow that..."
"I thought you were going to play the high harmony note, so I played ..."
After a minute or two of this, the selection of the next tune starts.
"How about Straight No Chaser?"
"No, we just did a blues, how about a latin tune? Girl From Ipanema?"
"OK, yeah. (starts flipping through Real Book) Wait, how about Triste?"
"Triste, yeah. Is that in Book 1 or Book 2?" (more flipping through books)
Now five minutes have gone by and we're still not playing yet.
If I'm ever a band leader, there will be a set list, all players will have it a week in advance, and all players will be expected to have their charts printed out, in order, at the start of the gig. Otherwise you are not getting your share of the $23 we made in tips. Wait, maybe that's the problem right there...
That's cool, but do you ever hire subs?
JohnMCA72 said:That's one of the worst things that a band can do, yet I see people (musicians) all the time who seem to think it's OK.
For me, it's not ok, however my band does it.
Sometimes the vibe of the room and what's happening with the crowd at any given point in time is not a match for that next song on the set list.
Blue
JohnMCA72 said:Standing around, debating the next song choice or commenting on the previous one, is never good.
The way to make "calling audibles" work is to have a BL who is decisive & can make the call quickly, & the rest of the band paying close attention, ready to play whatever is called without question or comment.
Is it me or do musicians today have no clue...
