Ive always looked at it as Weight, Density and the effects they have on the vibrating string....rather than focusing on the actual "wood" itself.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
100%.
I remember reading a story about some famous guitarists getting an opportunity to plug into Eddie Van Halen's touring rig and being disappointed it didn't make them sound like EVH.
Imagine the kind of growl you would get from a Rickenbacker made of tiger maple!!!And curly maple delivers a curly sound.
Yes! Vomit! I have a sensitive stomach. Find it ridiculous? Welcome to laugh ;PVomit? Fingerboard is 'most crucial'? C'mon.
I admire your confidence.Yes! Vomit! I have a sensitive stomach. Find it ridiculous? Welcome to laugh ;P
Of course it's not the most crucial thing in the world, you know...
It's far less crucial than... Almost everything.
But in the relatively unimportant subject of... wood... Fingerboard is alot IMO.
I can definitely tell the difference blindfolded between a Rosewood and a Maple neck... Try me. 99%. 100% if it's the same amp and the same model of Bass in similar production year.
Vomit? Fingerboard is 'most crucial'? C'mon. I can imagine some people might find that ridiculous. ;-)
Ever did a blindfolded test with (preferably blindfolded) people?
I only once touched an instrument that resembled the idea of vomit, and that was a Volcano. Not because of the woods that were used, it was the sound of the pickups in conjunction with the horrible frets. It sounded like grinding glass and it felt like it too.
Lets do this!!I admire your confidence.