My Sonus 5/2 re finish illustration, getting it done in a few days
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My Sonus 5/2 re finish illustration, getting it done in a few daysView attachment 1426413
It is a 1996 Sonus, this is how they were back then. And it is 35 inch scale,so... As far as I know,it is a 5/2Sorry but looks like a Special not a 5/2. Am I wrong?
Anyway, I like the colour.
The Special has the "neck" pickup much closer to the bridge pickup. And they are multi-coil design pickups, one coil per string.Sorry but looks like a Special not a 5/2. Am I wrong?
Anyway, I like the colour.
Hey Zoninites,
I'm not as much into the collecting aspect of bass as I used to be, but many years ago decided that if I got a birth year bass, I would get a Buffalo-made Zon to make it a birthplace bass as well. However, after years of casual searching, I've never seen any '87 Zons for sale. I know that Zon moved to California in September of '87... was there a lull in production in preparation for the move? Am I looking for something that doesn't exist? If anyone here has one, I'd love to see pictures!
And good luck with Ebay. I had a bass get to me once with damage and they wouldn't "protect" me based on the argument that it wasn't like that when it shipped. And clearly it was. So basically they sided on the side that made them money. I'm sorry but Ebay seriously sucks. Hope your experience is better. But I've never had a problem with a Zon neckHey Zon Club,
I just got this Sonus online from an E*ay seller. Maybe you saw it online. It HAS a truss rod, serial #9410285 (1994?) It arrived with the neck off (I agreed to that at sellers suggestion for ease of shipping and better protection (no case)). I put new strings on it 40-95 gauge and immediately the neck bowed. I am not going near the truss rod myself (don't want to make it worse and don't have the correct tool).
It seems to me this neck is just plain *bad* and probably not fixable (without huge cost at Zon)... because why would anyone turn the truss rod at all, if it arrived from the company with neck relief as it should be? Logically, this smells like a larger problem than just a truss rod adjustment esp. since the strings are not heavy.
I would really appreciate any real advice or thoughts if you are experienced in this area.
My initial feeling is to return it, and not monkey around with a fix. I am talking to the seller who claims innocent ignorance. (I may have to count on e*ay buyer protection). The seller offered to cover the reasonable cost of local repairman's adjustment. I'll be talking to my local repair guy though I'm not going to travel far for it... and I am gathering a lot of information (you guys!). Thanks.View attachment 1824459 View attachment 1824460View attachment 1824464
I don't think Joe was using truss rods back in 1994. The three I had (1997, 1998, 1999) had no truss rods and IIRC, I never read about Zons with truss rods until sometime in the early '00?...If the seller didn't even know there was a truss rod then it was never adjusted - since 1994(?)...
A seller insisting to ship with the neck removed is a red flag in my book.
Martin Peters at Zon Guitars wrote to me that truss rods were not done on Zons until 2007I don't think Joe was using truss rods back in 1994. The three I had (1997, 1998, 1999) had no truss rods and IIRC, I never read about Zons with truss rods until sometime in the early '00?
My sonus was made in 2005, and has a trussrod. I had it adjusted in person a few months back.Martin Peters at Zon Guitars wrote to me that truss rods were not done on Zons until 2007
From what I've learned, the purpose of a truss rod in a composite neck is for the option to add a small bit of neck relief to suit the individual playing style (e.g. aggressive attack) and not to correct a major forward/backward bow.
The primary function of the truss rod in a composite neck is to add or subtract from the default neck relief. There's no such thing as 'perfect' amount of neck relief: some players prefer nearly flat (John Entwistle, as I recall), others prefer more curvature.
A secondary function would be to correct for excessive bow (one way or the other). A problem with some composite necks is when the fingerboard expands/shrinks at a different rate than the rest, especially when neck and board are made of different materials. I owned a Music Man Cutlass for two decades -- it was a Stingray with Modulus CF neck, and the fingerboard was phenolic -- no truss rod. Over time, neck relief became more curved. The bass never became unplayable (fortunately) but I had to settle for action that was higher than I would have preferred.