• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Oh jeez not another P vs J thread!

Hear me out!

I saw someone mention in another thread that a Jazz-style configuration has more "tonal options" than a traditional Precision, split-coil does.

I'm not so sure. The jazz has more knobs, and more separate pickups, but I find that the onboard controls of a P create a huge swing in tone shapes, and that my P is much more responsive to amp eq and pedal chain than my J. Where did the idea of the jazz being more versatile than the p come from, do you believe it or not, and why?
Okay...
- The idea comes from the fact that a Jazz bass has 2 pickups; without touching a tone control, one can get a different tone from; the bridge pickup only; the neck pickup only; or both together. A P-Bass needs the tone control, and/or playing at different places above or below the pickup, to get different tones. All of which can be done with a Jazz Bass, too. So, sorry; it's still ahead in the versatile contest...
- Do I believe it? It's a demonstrative fact. Doesn't matter whether I believe it or not.
-Why do I believe it? See answer ^^above^^ However...
The real question - AFAIC- is "Do I like the tones I get from a Jazz Bass, or do I like the tones I get from a P-Bass; or do I like them both? And, AFAIC the answer is...
I like some of the tones I can get from a Jazz Bass. What I don't like is the Jazz Bass itself. Happily, I can get those tones from basses I do like (and own), so I don't have to suffer a bass I don't care for. As for a P-Bass? I like and use every tone I'm able to coax out of my A-spec necked '78 P-Bass. The one I've owned and played for 33 years, now...:cool:
 
Last edited: