TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I am using the XL Nickelwounds now that they stopped making Slowounds.It is true that,after they break in a little,they sound like Slowounds.
But fresh out of the package,the XL Nickelwounds have alot more high-mids in them.The Slowounds were much smoother sounding new,

I'm glad to see others like Slowounds. I think I've got a couple sets in reserve.
That's exactly what I thought, seeing the thread title. What an awesome band name though! "The Old Slow Wounds", or even just Old Slow Wound as a nickname like Slow Hand or Blind Lemon.I always remember when somebody looked at the packet and was horrified - that sounds disgusting, they were imagining blood pouring slowly from a wound that would not heal!
The original XL (they've been around for decades) weren't. But when D'Addario stopped making SloWounds, they said it was because they started using the technology on all their strings. And the only difference in 1999 or so between XL and SloWounds was the machine they were wound on. They used the same wires with the same alloys on all the nickle strings.
John
The Slowounds were D'Addario's premium nickel strings. Yes as technology on the XL Series got better,D'Addario could not justify selling what were basically the same string. If you research it out you find the XL's are still wound at normal speed, unlike the Slowounds which were wound at a slower speed.
So since you said yourself there is no difference in the strings, why does it matter?