don’t know about a roasted Maple frame, but Craig Calfee in NorCal can build you a spectacular Bamboo frame!My gravel bike..... gonna replace the aluminum frame with a roasted maple frame.
View attachment 7225897
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
don’t know about a roasted Maple frame, but Craig Calfee in NorCal can build you a spectacular Bamboo frame!My gravel bike..... gonna replace the aluminum frame with a roasted maple frame.
View attachment 7225897
He @matthewbrown has a point though.My gravel bike..... gonna replace the aluminum frame with a roasted maple frame.
View attachment 7225897
I guess that's true about most things...That's only if they go through the "correct" process.
I have half a dozen basses. 5 of them are maple. 3 of these are roasted . The notes on the non roasted have more pop and presence. The notes really sing and jump off the fretboards. I think your friend is correct.A friend owns at least two dozen basses, including 3 or 4 with roasted necks. He's done some testing and is convinced that roasted maple has a softer tone, with less edge/presence/brightness as non-roasted. I haven't seen much talk about this, but if he's correct, I'd prefer non-roasted for tone alone, even though I think roasted looks gorgeous with the right build.
I fully believe that both roasted and non-roasted maple will remain available going forward. However this won't be true for every model of every bass. Meaning: some models will only offer one or the other, rather than a choice.
You know Viking is what they did, not who they were. Viking is an action or a job, not a peopleTorrefaction (aka roasting) is not a new process - the Vikings - not the football team, the actual Vikings (who relied on their hardware for constant warfare and pillaging) torrefied the wood they made their warships out of, because it held up better in the environment. So, the knowledge about what the correct process is (and the experiential knowledge that properly torrefied stuff holds up just fine) is over 1400 years old.
If you want a neck to survive physically, making it like a Fender (straight grain through the non tiltback headstock), or with a scarf joint (if you want a tiltback headstock) is far more important than whether or not the wood is roasted. I've made about 20 basses with roasted necks, and never had an issue with it being brittle or weak.
I have a bunch of basses with roasted swamp ash bodies - although I do it for the weight, once you get a body that's roasted, they look so good that it'd be a shame to slap paint over them:Over-roasted maple can remind me of a person with a tanning addiction, in that it's not always the most aesthetically pleasing. Light roasting can be okay though. IMO the biggest benefit of roasting isn't looks, but weight reduction for roasted bodies. I'd like to see more roasted bodies with solid color paint, just for the weight.
I notice an increase in the use of roasted maple for necks on production basses. Even low cost production basses. Do you think all maple necks will eventually be roasted?
It could be, since few low cost bass like China made entry level Bacchus bass has roasted neck version with just tiny price increment compare to normal maple neck version.
Even Asian brand Soloking use roasted neck as neck standard for all the line.
Roasted process also more easy to control , stable and take shorten time to process compare to dehydration process that been use on previous Fender Roadworn line.(And some current day Custom shop neck.)
My cheapo Bacchus BJB1RMS roasted neck need less truss rod tweak per year than Charvel Pro Mod PJ which has reinforced rod inside the roasted neck. Keep in tune well , least dramatic neck shape change when humic/temperature change .
But there are crazy tonight or untweakable problem report on sterling bass overcooked roasted neck. Too dry the wood also has risk on crack problems when redrilling new hole for machine head upgrade.....
You did see the "smilee" at the end?Torrefaction (aka roasting) is not a new process - the Vikings - not the football team, the actual Vikings (who relied on their hardware for constant warfare and pillaging) torrefied the wood they made their warships out of, because it held up better in the environment. So, the knowledge about what the correct process is (and the experiential knowledge that properly torrefied stuff holds up just fine) is over 1400 years old.
If you want a neck to survive physically, making it like a Fender (straight grain through the non tiltback headstock), or with a scarf joint (if you want a tiltback headstock) is far more important than whether or not the wood is roasted. I've made about 20 basses with roasted necks, and never had an issue with it being brittle or weak.
Could be also that giant whale hump single cut thing affecting the tone pehapsI just got my first roasted maple neck bass a month ago. It's a budget Harley Benton multi-scale 5-string.
I don't know if it's the roasting, the laminated 5-piece neck of roasted maple and okoum, the roasted maple fretboard,or the fanned frets. The bass sounds very even, almost compressed, with a lot of sustain.
View attachment 7226313
View attachment 7226314
don’t know about a roasted Maple frame, but Craig Calfee in NorCal can build you a spectacular Bamboo frame!
Torrefaction (aka roasting) is not a new process - the Vikings - not the football team, the actual Vikings (who relied on their hardware for constant warfare and pillaging) torrefied the wood they made their warships out of, because it held up better in the environment. So, the knowledge about what the correct process is (and the experiential knowledge that properly torrefied stuff holds up just fine) is over 1400 years old.
This is factually correct ^You know Viking is what they did, not who they were. Viking is an action or a job, not a people
We all get it wrong![]()