• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Orginal band wanting to do covers show, same name?

It's generally not a good idea to extend your brand equity into a (technically) competitive product or service unless you're a brand as universally recognized and established as Microsoft.

tl:dr version - each individual band, or independent music project, should have it's own unique name. (Think: Travelling Wilburys.)
 
This has always been my strategy for building a following for original bands. Play both covers and originals under the same name. Make the covers your own - if people wanted to hear it exactly like the original, there would be a jukebox or DJ, not a live band. The more of a following you get, the more originals you can throw in the set.


My vote is to keep the same name. You won't build a following for the original act by using a different name.

This. The most successful originals band I was ever in used the exact same strategy starting with a 50/50 mix of originals to covers (more due to lack of enough original material at first) to eventually doing 95% originals plus a few covers each night. We also always did some covers even though we had five solid sets of originals at that point.

We found covers were good icebreakers which provided a point of familiarity for new audience members. Once they heard something they recognized, they were a lot more receptive to hearing what else the band had to offer.

If you do covers as part of an original act, try doing them the way we did: as mini-medleys of another band's big hits.

Start with the intro to one song, segue smoothly into a second and do roughly the first verse instrumentally, then morph into a third song that gets played all the way through with vocals. We did that with the Aerosmith, Bowie, and the Kinks catalog. (Ex: Dream On/Train Kept A Rollin'/Somebody for our Aero "mud-ley")

Point is, when you're an original group doing a cover, make it as obvious as possible you're doing a cover - and playing around with it. Never do one that's simply a note for note copy of the original. Do it better than the original.
 
It's generally not a good idea to extend your brand equity into a (technically) competitive product or service unless you're a brand as universally recognized and established as Microsoft.

tl:dr version - each individual band, or independent music project, should have it's own unique name. (Think: Travelling Wilburys.)
Normally I would agree with you, but a band is probably one of the toughest brands to grow and I personally feel it's the wrong approach in the case of a band.

after all you are still the same group of guys playing music. and they're playing music in the same genre at that.
 
Normally I would agree with you, but a band is probably one of the toughest brands to grow and I personally feel it's the wrong approach in the case of a band.

after all you are still the same group of guys playing music. and they're playing music in the same genre at that.

Agree up to a point. But despite being composed of the same group of guys and gals, the band itself is also its own personality and identity. And despite how much we hate to be labeled or identified with one particular genre or type of venue, people do just that with a band. As anybody who tried to change directions with a successful and established band has discovered. (Remember Dylan?) Because with that, you risk alienating your current fanbase in hopes of capturing a larger or different fanbase. And it seldom works. At least from what I've seen.

Also, within the realm of originals bands (where I've mostly worked) it seems there is an issue of credibility if your band is musically bipolar. The people that are willing to listen to originals tend to raise their eyebrows if you also play cover nights (or weddings, etc.) when you're saying you have aspirations to be an originals band. It's almost as if you're expected to choose a side and stick with it. At least in my experience.

Which is why I echoed blixild's idea of including some covers in an originals band. That was precisely what my old band did without raising too much push back from our diehards. But at no time did we ever once do a complete cover set (or night) or do the songs the way most cover bands do - which is to say a fairly accurate emulation combined with a few bits of the band's own invention. Our "covers" were close enough for recognition, but different enough that it usually raised a smile when people realized what we were playing. In intrigued some people and amused the others. But at all times we kept our own sound and style in the forefront. And I think if you're serious about being an originals band, you have to take that into consideration.

From what I've seen, you can start out as a cover band (Van Halen, Tom Petty, Billy Joel, etc.) - but once you step over the line and basically announce you're an originals band, your fans don't usually appreciate or accept it when you try to take a step back. Like I said, it seems to be you're expected to pick a side and stick with it.

But that's just my own experience. And I'm sure there are a lot here whose band - and band branding - experience has been very different than mine. Hopefully they're chime in on how it works (or doesn't) for them. Because I'm very interested in hearing what anyone at TB with band experience has to add to this discussion. (Because I'm still learning how to do it.) :)
 
It's an old example, but I can't help but think of The Beatles. In their early days, they were 99% covers. Then when they started to write and record original music, it took a long time to build a repertoire of good originals. Their first three releases are about 50% covers, and they took that to the stage as well. One band name worked just fine for them, and if they had tried to achieve that level of success with two names, I can't see where it would have helped them one bit.

As it stands, many people still think they wrote some of the covers they made famous like "Twist and Shout," "Till There Was You," "Chains," and "A Taste Of Honey." If you want to succeed as an originals band, start putting your own unique stamp on your covers and work some originals into your sets. If you do it right, your audiences will eagerly adapt and develop an appreciation for who you are, whether you're playing originals or covers.
 

Latest posts