TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Pro move right therei have two so i use both.
Funny...Interesting initial polling results, but perhaps not totally unexpected;
2:1 (in favor of) EQ to Drive
Many drives out there, but no other DCX Bass EQz!
Let's look at it again...shall we....
View attachment 5266567
ORView attachment 5266568
That will be the next poll...
NoDoes the DCX have any purpose in front of a BassRig Super Vintage? Like, would it enhance anything? Or is it redundant?
Does the DCX have any purpose in front of a BassRig Super Vintage? Like, would it enhance anything? Or is it redundant?
Does the DCX have any purpose in front of a BassRig Super Vintage? Like, would it enhance anything? Or is it redundant?
After the SV as a tone enhancer makes more sense to me considering the DCX is based on the UA 610 preamp for studio recording where an Ampeg bass amp would be first in the chain--but I'm just me.
Does the DCX have any purpose in front of a BassRig Super Vintage? Like, would it enhance anything? Or is it redundant?
Considering I'd use the DCX as an OD more so than an EQ, I'd say in front of the BassRig. Otherwise, how am I making use of the DI output and the fantastic cabsim when going direct? I always put drive pedals before the amp (if we consider the BassRig an "amp").