So i'm talking to my buddy(who's a guitarist). We can't decide who's the better guitarist, Jimi Hendrix, or Jimmy Page. I personally think its Hendrix(no offense to Page, but Hendrix took guitar to a new level). Opinions?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
AxtoOx said:Page started out in the studio...
MikeyFingers said:Page is an awesome guitarist and I LOVE Zeppelin's music. He has some of the greatest and most recognized guitar riffs ever....but so does Jimi.
I went with Hendrix. This is another case of the importance of the music over-riding the technical skill.
I love Page, I love Zeppelin, I love those songs... but man, I don't care if he was a session guitarist, his leads suck. As often as you hear "Page is sloppy," it's true. I don't care if it's considered the most influential guitar solo of all time- he's sloppy as anything. For example, I used to love the Dazed and Confused solo- and I always accepted that solo as a part of the song, heard the solo a zillion times, played that solo a few hundred times, but I never really listened to it. One day I was in the car in the middle of nowhere and I actually listened to Dazed and Confused. I seriously have played that solo at least as good as Page pulled it off. It's a mess with missed notes, flubs, bad timing... the works- but it's still a great solo and fits the song perfectly.Matt Till said:Page is junk when it comes to leads, his leads are truely awful. He's an OK riffer, he in fact, helped invent riffing... one might argue them just LOUDER blues riffs, but still.
Hendrix didn't write it either.FretlessFreak said:-And Page never wrote Hey Joe,
Scott Zoltok said:I prefer apples, although oranges are quite nice as well.