^
I'm glad "Time" is giving Paul the recognition and I hope to buy an issue. I didn't even know it was out.
I'm glad "Time" is giving Paul the recognition and I hope to buy an issue. I didn't even know it was out.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Paul McCartney vs Gene Simmons
- Thread starter Vinnyboonbots
- Start date
Alkali Ike
Gold Supporting Member
- Jan 1, 2011
- 2,850
- 15,650
- Disclosures
- I never actually learned to play very well
You know, I get so tired of the Gene bashing, especially on this forum. Gene is a better bassist than the majority of the members here, and he sings at the same time, all while dancing in massive boots and putting on one of the best shows in the industry.
KISS is, was, and will be heavy metal Beatles. This was their stated intention, and they haven't changed in the least. Yes, Sir Paul's a better bassist, but Gene can hold his own, and he is much more entertaining.
KISS is, was, and will be heavy metal Beatles. This was their stated intention, and they haven't changed in the least. Yes, Sir Paul's a better bassist, but Gene can hold his own, and he is much more entertaining.
The Beatles are a lot like my in-laws. They're ok for a few minutes, and then they start to get on my nerves.
