...The day after I posted my question for BbbyBld, I stumbled on a great deal on a vb-2! A local music store had one for 35% off from list price. Keep in mind that, in Sweden, list is pretty much what you expect to pay. You might get 5% off if you haggle.
Bought it yesterday, and spent the entire evening in the bands rehearsal space just cranking it by myself
It really does have something ampeg'y about it. Mostly in the way the input section will grunt, rather than fart or buzz, when pushed (The drive channel can get a little buzzy though, unless you tweak it carefully). Also in the way the EQ responds, although it seems to have less range than the ampeg. (my ampeg experience mainly revolves around a svp cl and a 70's v4b). The EQ is enginering genius in my book. The ease of use of use of the ampeg tone stack using fewer tubes, and probably a lot fewer other components as well (no inductor coil I presume). Beats passive EQ any day of the week.
BbbyBld, Am i comletely off base to assume that it is a baxandall-based circuit with a pre-shaped mid boost that matches a passive mid cut circuit?
I dont really know what I'talking about, most of my analog electronics "knowledge" comes from the internet, haha.
Next rehearsal is monday. It'll be interesting to se how it holds up in terms of volume. Wee play pretty loud.
Now for the niggles
I agree with everyone who say the handles suck! They're excelent for lifting the amp, since you dont have to bend down quite as far. But they're pretty useless for actually carrying the thing. The amp hangs down infront of your lags making it awkward to walk, unless you hold it up a bit which you can only do if you have the biceps of Arnold S. in his prime.
The overdrive channel, what a pitty...
I don't agree that it sounds bad. I can make it sound GREAT! But I can't make it sound great while also having a good sound on the clean channel. I don't really have a problem matching the volumes. I have a problem matching the tones. Anyway, for a price this low, the OD channel is really just a cool little bonus.
Third, I'm not really into some aspects of the "tongue out" look, but thats a really minor point.
It seems to me Peavey got everything important right with this one. Good basic tone, good EQ, 2-8ohm, reasonable power at reasonable weight. Low price for a tube amp. I think I can easily live with the minor shortcomings.
Then again, I shouldn't pretend that I'm over the honeymoon period
It looks promising though!