• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Pick your favorite iconic car from any decade....

I seriously considered getting a 924 or 928, but there's a story with that.

At the time, I was driving an Audi 200 sedan (turbo, FWD) and the mechanic I worked with was really good with German and turbo cars. He had a couple of Porsches including a 924 turbo. One day we were chatting about repair costs, and he told me that he was re-mounting the turbo on his 924, and said the bolts were a special cobalt alloy and had to be replaced when the turbo was installed.

He then asked me what I thought those bolts cost (this was about 1987). Turns out they cost him $100 each at his mechanic's rate, and it took four to mount the turbo.

$400 for four bolts? In 1987? That made my Audi look like an economy car. It has put me off owning Porsches ever since.
 
Thanks, That little Fiat is part of the reason I love the lines of 1950's sports cars.

Many folks have forgotten that until the end of the 50's heaters were an option in many cars, especially pickups. Old pickups were often bought with no heater at at all. I once drove that Fiat for a week in winter without a heater when the core developed a leak. I pulled the core, used a short length of heater hose to connect the engine heater connections and bypass the core. I spent a week driving with a hanky stuffed in my mouth so I wouldn't breathe on the windshield and fog it up. I was happy when the radiator shop returned the core to me.

There's certainly no denying that ABS and some other things like air bags are nice to have. They do increase safety, especially for less skilled drivers or for that odd situation when someone else does something so egregiously stupid that there's no way out of a collision.

I'm not quite as impressed by backup cameras or proximity sensors, because they're part of a number of new federally mandated items that add a lot of cost and design complexity to new cars. I have a backup camera and proximity sensors in my 2016 Jeep, but I trust my rear view mirrors more.

I don't have ABS or an air bag in my 1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo. I'm perfectly happy without them. I drive that car with the intent to miss other people, not to collide with them.

I didn't have them in my mom's 1950 Studebaker, her 1953 Ford sedan, her 1963 Ford wagon, my 1959 Ford, my dad's 1953 Ford pickup, 1959 Ford pickup, and his 1958 Mercedes 219 Sedan. I also didn't have them in my 1966 GTO, 1970 240Z, 1976 280Z, 1977 Chevy Monza Spyder and my 1982 280ZX, as well as a dozen other cars.

Even before there was ABS, we had a technique called "threshold braking" that does about the same thing. Also, the alert driver has been known to pump the brakes on low traction surfaces.
My first car was a 1961 Rambler American. I was 17 when I got it in 1974. It had no safety provisions of any sort and was built, I think, with a few provisions to inhibit the owner's life expectancy. No seat belts, no padded dash, drum brakes at all four corners, vacuum operated windshield wipers and, despite an I-6 flathead engine, it didn't develop enough horses power to get out of its own way. You couldn't pay me to own that car again.
 
I think most US cars got seat belts in 1964. That was definitely a step in the right direction!

Rambler/AMC didn't give up on vacuum wipers until much later. My sister had a Gremlin that my dad tried three different vacuum motor drives on, but none of them worked. The wipers would go down, but not back up. She drove it for years with a string tied to the driver's side wiper, routed inside where she could grab it. When it rained, she'd turn the wipers on...they would go down and she'd yank the string to pull them back up for each stroke. That got really old on 5-hour drives from Pullman to Seattle.
 
Last edited:
mgtc(4).jpg
 
My first car was a 1961 Rambler American. I was 17 when I got it in 1974. It had no safety provisions of any sort and was built, I think, with a few provisions to inhibit the owner's life expectancy. No seat belts, no padded dash, drum brakes at all four corners, vacuum operated windshield wipers and, despite an I-6 flathead engine, it didn't develop enough horses power to get out of its own way. You couldn't pay me to own that car again.
When I was very little, my mom had a Pontiac Tempest convertible. I overheard my older brother talking to my cousin about how underpowered the car was - "It would be an honor to get a speeding ticket in that car". Of course her next car, a '69 442 convertible, kind of went the other way in the HP dept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rollie 55 and D M C
Love the old Studies. Those vettes are something else, too!
I had a '63 Lark Wagonaire. Put all my (and my gf's) stuff in it and moved to SF back in '82. Much like this one, but far less pristine, and without the rich folks' background.
It was a crazy car, and if ever a car had personality, that was the one.
1963-1966-Studebaker-Lark-Wagonaire-rear-right-side-view.jpg
 


Brute Force and ignorance at it's finest...... For their time, the L88 and LS6 were the most potent engines to roll off an assembly line.

While the modem LS engine may make more power with less cubes than the 427 and 454 did, there's something about the visual appeal and snotty idle of a high compression Big Block that modern engines will never duplicate.