• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Pilot Light on an amplifier (electronics question)

Shoot, I was hoping somebody would pop in with the "right" answer! I think the bridge rectifier was a good idea.

Yeah, it's a good idea if you want a true DC output (albeit unfiltered), but in this circumstance, it's not all that necessary. The only difference is that the LED blinks at 30Hz, instead of 60Hz. I can see the difference, but it's not all that noticeable.
 
I was gonna ask the same question. An LED is a diode.

LED's don't handle much reverse current, whereas a regular diode can handle more. I use a regular diode to block reverse voltage, and make sure the LED doesn't burn up.

I also used current limiting resistors to extend the LED's life. It's marginally dimmer, but it will keep the LED going for a long while.
 
If I recall correctly a diode will have a forward voltage drop of 0.7v. So you really have 2.7v across the LED. Did you use current limiting resistor?

This might help.

Link Removed
 
If I recall correctly a diode will have a forward voltage drop of 0.7v. So you really have 2.7v across the LED. Did you use current limiting resistor?

This might help.

Link Removed

Yes to the resistors. See above. :)

What I am wondering is, will a diode bother the filament circuit on a tube amp? Because that is what this is connected to. All tubes seem to warm up properly, and the amp sounds fine (fantastic, in fact).
 
Yes to the resistors. See above. :)

What I am wondering is, will a diode bother the filament circuit on a tube amp? Because that is what this is connected to. All tubes seem to warm up properly, and the amp sounds fine (fantastic, in fact).

I don't think that will be a problem. The LED should only be pulling about 15-20Ma, a small fraction of the current available to the tube filaments.
 
Here's how it looks!

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Yeahey! That LED under the old jewel apparently turned out just fine. I chuckled when you mentioned the LED is responding to the 30HZ portion of either the negative or the positive remainder of the AC sine wave post diode-filtering upstream from your new LED. Pretty kool...pretty kool indeed. :smug: Neat solution.. I love it.
 
LED's don't handle much reverse current, whereas a regular diode can handle more. I use a regular diode to block reverse voltage, and make sure the LED doesn't burn up.

I also used current limiting resistors to extend the LED's life. It's marginally dimmer, but it will keep the LED going for a long while.
ah i see what you did. You might as well make your rectifier complete by adding the cap and filtering out the AC.
 
Nah, I think the 30Hz flicker is not noticeable, and I used the original bayonet base from the blown bulb in order to retain originality. There's just no more room in there.

Wouldn't it be 60Hz flicker? You're eliminating have the wave, but that half of a wave still has a frequency of 60Hz. If you threw in a bridge rectifier, and used both halves of the wave, but did not filter it, then the LED would light up at 120Hz, because essentially, it'd have forward bias twice each cycle. Or am I thinking about this wrong?
 
Wouldn't it be 60Hz flicker? You're eliminating have the wave, but that half of a wave still has a frequency of 60Hz. If you threw in a bridge rectifier, and used both halves of the wave, but did not filter it, then the LED would light up at 120Hz, because essentially, it'd have forward bias twice each cycle. Or am I thinking about this wrong?

I think you may be right... possibly. 1Hz is a vibration back and forth in a second. So, really the cycle is back AND forth. I forgot about that. So, it really is 60Hz. Thanks for pointing that out! :)
 

Latest posts