TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So which do most people prefer? The P bass pickup placement in the standard Fender configuration, or reversed like the Ibanez basses?
Fender has stuck to their guns and have never deviated from the original split P layout on any P or PJ bass they've released to my recollection
there was the power jazz specialOops...except for the Hoppus, which shouldn't count since it's a signature model.
Oops...except for the Hoppus, which shouldn't count since it's a signature model.
Yup...and I was just looking at those today, in fact I even posted a dang picture of one myself in this very thread!there was the power jazz special
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1987-vintag...SH-/271679637523?pt=Bassi&hash=item3f415e4813
it's a bit tighter sounding on the E&A and fuller on the D&G. it helps provide some tonal balance across the strings whereas with the standard placement it sort of thumps on the low string and sings on the high strings. to me, it makes a bigger difference on a PJ than a standard p, but i still prefer the reversed p over standard.I'd like try a bass with the treble side closer to the neck. It seems to make more sense. I'd be curious to see how much of a difference it actually makes.
it's a bit tighter sounding on the E&A and fuller on the D&G. it helps provide some tonal balance across the strings whereas with the standard placement it sort of thumps on the low string and sings on the high strings. to me, it makes a bigger difference on a PJ than a standard p, but i still prefer the reversed p over standard.
For instance it is sort of telling that Fender has stuck to their guns and have never deviated from the original split P layout on any P or PJ bass they've released to my recollection.