TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
unbroken: This makes no sense. Why not play ON the beat and do your band (and the mandolin player) a favour? Isn't that the bass player's job?
I see your point @martinc though I reckon maybe it's a matter of different players interpreting the "beat" being in subtly different places. What feels like the back is sometimes square if someone else is rushing, or vice versa. But it's all a fluid thing and highly tempo-dependent imo, metronomes/click tracks aside.
y.
Here's the ironic part. If the first player perceives the second player is pushing too far ahead, the natural tendency is to pull back to keep time from rushing. But what if the second player thinks the first player is pulling back too much and dragging. This can cause the second player to push even harder.
One of my favorite things about playing bass for bluegrass (or most string/drummerless bands) is the ability to manipulate the tempo to my likingBut every single mandolin player I know rushes the tempos, so I feel my job is generally to hang on the back of the beat so that the whole tune doesn't start rolling down a hill...
I'm into the slower, heartfelt numbers anyway more so than the way downtown foolin around kinda thing, just my taste
Right?? Everyone's hip to practicing their chops, but those who actually work on the singing voice are rare birds it seems. And not to condescend, I'm in that group too. My partner is a singer's singer, Westminster trained and such, which has caused me to be much more self-aware in my singing, but also less confident because now I hear all the shortcomings and am more frustrated by it, less inclined to practice or volunteer to sing lead as a result.But then you need a good singer, which is sadly in short supply (relative to the amount of shredders)
And so I focus on the bass..I'm somewhat with @martinc here. Could it be that the mandolinist seems to be ahead of the tempo because you are behind it? I've perceived what you're perceiving playing very fast pieces... when I've had a chance to listen to recordings of it, I hear the tension, and it would have sounded better if I'd just gone with the flow. See if you can find the Foggy Mountain Bows playing "Rolling in My Sweet Baby's Arms" at a ridiculous tempo; it's as though they're about to fall off the cliff, but they never do... and it's great.
This has been my experience with some mandolin players, a couple local guys in particular (who happen to also be drummers... coincidence?Playing with people in the second group without a metronome to arbitrate tempo often results in time running away to the point where the tune loses its characteristic feel or groove. But as long as they can technically play the notes, people in the second group seem to enjoy it even more. So it could also be that they have the skill to lock in the tempo, but self-serving interest get in the way. I.E. they get a high from playing faster, and rather than exerting the discipline required to play at the appropriate tempo, they either push it were they want it or go with the flow when someone else does.
This has been my experience with some mandolin players, a couple local guys in particular (who happen to also be drummers... coincidence?)
Not particularly falling into either group myself, I'd venture to say there might be a third, hybrid group as well. I practice individually to a metronome but I'm not fond of click tracks, have never had trouble syncing with them but I find it distracting from my experience of the music. I know it's largely necessary if one wants to make the type of recording that you can chop up and fly stuff around in protools, but these aren't my favorite types of recordings either.. I enjoy some variability in the tempo, but prefer it to be conscious and intentional, rather than the product of one player's zeal. /opinion
.
.I think one potential problem is people seem to have at least two different philosophies on the subject. Some like music to be settled and stable, and some people like the music to breath more.
Desiring the music to be settled and stable means the tempo remains consistent. It doesn't mean that the pocket cannot vary stylistically a bit from section to section as it should. In my experience these people often prefer for the drummer to use a click and think it encourages consistency and musicality.
People who prefer for the music to breath are not concerned if tempo varies, and will even argue that it makes the music sterile if tempo is stable. They hate using a click and think it stifles musicality.
I fall in the first group and often wonder if people in the second group simply have bad time and are unwilling to deal with it. Playing with people in the second group without a metronome to arbitrate tempo often results in time running away to the point where the tune loses its characteristic feel or groove. But as long as they can technically play the notes, people in the second group seem to enjoy it even more. So it could also be that they have the skill to lock in the tempo, but self-serving interest get in the way. I.E. they get a high from playing faster, and rather than exerting the discipline required to play at the appropriate tempo, they either push it were they want it or go with the flow when someone else does.
Regardless of whether my perceptions have any merit, group one and group two people tend to disagree strongly on the subject, which can cause conflict in the group and a great deal of dissatisfaction.
Another important factor is whether the drummer can play well with a click. Some can, and some can not. There are also some drummers who can, but will fake an inability to play with a click.
Is playing with a click (when you're not recording) really a thing? If so, I'm REALLY old and in the way... I've never even heard of that. What's next? Digital pitch correction?
Seriously - get off my lawn!
. 
I was going to say, yes and it has been for decades, but you're obviously being sarcastic.
![]()
I've seen most of the live stuff done with a visual metronome (read: computer/ipad screen). Most folks just use it for countoffs but definitely some folks keep it on, even beat-maps when the song has timing changes! I don't like to see it any more often than I like hearing backing tracks.. which is probably never..Only half sarcastic... I'm serious in that I've heard inklings about drummers using a click in a live situation, but I've never come close to one (and wouldn't). I'm gobsmacked.
This has been my experience with some mandolin players, a couple local guys in particular (who happen to also be drummers... coincidence?)
Not particularly falling into either group myself, I'd venture to say there might be a third, hybrid group as well. I practice individually to a metronome but I'm not fond of click tracks, have never had trouble syncing with them but I find it distracting from my experience of the music. I know it's largely necessary if one wants to make the type of recording that you can chop up and fly stuff around in protools, but these aren't my favorite types of recordings either.. I enjoy some variability in the tempo, but prefer it to be conscious and intentional, rather than the product of one player's zeal. /opinion
Incredible picker, masters degree in live performance, but invariably would screw up the tempo at some point in many many songs in our list